2. music
  3. 1313031323

HDtrack not necessarily better?

Im curious if anyone else has had this experience with HD tracks. The Eagles album "Hotel California" is an album I've loved since I first heard it in the late 70s playing on a Myer Emco floor system and heard countless times since on multiple systems. It's not a sonic spectacular but the midrange vocals, guitar just take me back to times past. I tend to use it as first pass to judge midrange harmonic integrity.
Recently I purchased the hi rez 192khz PC version and settled in with high hopes of hearing improvement and details that a CD rip didn't provide. What I got was top and bottom octave improvement but in the midrange the album became polite vs harmonically satisfying. My guess so far is that the DVD source (per downloaded artwork) used was a different mix from CD and that somone focused on a multichannel experience failing to do justice to a 2 channel listener recording. I've had this experience before with audio DVD.... would really not like to spend money on indifferently mixed 2 channel sound.

Thoughts? has anyone else experienced same? any good review reference points so that one can be sure the high rez download version doesn't disappoint?
davide256

Showing 1 response by shadorne

shadorne's avatar
shadorne
7,477 posts
 
I have found HDtracks to be consistently on par with the best that is out there. In some cases you are simply getting the same master that was sold on two channel DVD Audio or two channel SACD but I have not yet found anything to complain about. In some cases you are getting better than the best out there. Tom Petty Hi-res albums on HD tracks are a new high watermark for TP recordings that were already generally A+ quality to begin with.

You may need to recalibrate or take a hard look at your system.
More to discover