Have You Seen - 10 Characteristics of Great Audiophile Sound

To me, the list is a subset of the groundbreaking literary work by J. Gordon Holt starting in 1962 in Stereophile and summarized in Sounds Like?  A Audio Glossary, Jul 29, 1993 and Harry Pearson starting in 1973 and summarized in How to Readthe Absolute Sound, for which I do not remember the formal reference. Yes this podcast addresses key points of audiophile sound and simplification is not a bad thing for some, not for me.  I may disagree with you George (@ghdprentice) in that I miss the list of esoteric stuff and artistic descriptives of the many aspects of sound from the “old” days of those publications that challenged and stimulated my mind to understand the sound of a system or equipment from the reviewers perspective.  I understood what Mr. Pearson ment by a chocolatey sound.   I find the current reviews sterile, without passion, and tamed by the hand of legal review in our now more litigious society, making it more difficult to ascertain the sound from the reviewers perspective. I agree with @steakster  in that the list misses the attributes of audiophile sound most important to me … timbre … for without timbral accuracy it cannot approach the sound of real music, and is that the point of the hobby.  So again I have been too verbose in expressing the fact that this simple list is too simple. 

 We all have our descriptors, but that list works for me.

Got to agree on the PS Audio speaker shot maybe they were trying to tackle the acceptance factor.

@jsalerno277 I really like the addition of timbre it's maybe part of the "You hear details in recordings you don’t hear from lesser systems" section but it could be emphasized by expanding into timbre. It helps cover @steakster response too about reality as that's definitely something timbre provides.

Thanks for everyone's responses, I just thought I'd share and see what others think, thanks again.