Has the ASR review/hatchet job on the Musetec MH-DA005 Changed Anyone's Mind?


A little over a year ago, after seeing so many glowing reviews of the 005 on this and other fora, I bought the DAC and thought it made a great improvement over my Mytek Brooklyn DAC+ (which I now use on my #2 system). Recently, I came across the ASR review, which concludes that the 005 is a piece of crap. I know that ASR has a dubious (at best) reputation in this forum, but I wonder if its review has caused anyone to have second thoughts about the Musetec. I confess I was initially concerned by questions like, why hasn't Musetec responded to the horrible ASR review, if it is inaccurate? But, then, every time I listen to my system with the 005 DAC in it, it sounds glorious. Obviously, the guidance, "trust what your hear" is important, but I'm not sure I'd be as trustful of my ears if the negative technical review came from, say, John Atkinson, who has far more professional legitimacy in measuring equipment. I confess I have one more than one occasion refrained from buying a certain item because of his test results. (Where I live, it is not feasible to listen to amps in stores before buying, and one quickly grows weary of buying and returning expensive equipment on line, especially equipment that does not have stellar subjective and objective accolades).  

audio-satisficer

Showing 1 response by mitch2

If you like the sound of the DAC then don't worry about a negative review or what others think.

Regarding the the review being a "hatchet job", I didn't read it that way.  There was some early nitpicking about the remote and a power-up delay, but I didn't read anything I would classify as being malicious, unjustified, or irresponsible.  Amir performed measurements on a brand new DAC using his test equipment.  He reported the results and pointed out areas where the review sample performed well (linearity and dynamics) as well as areas where it performed poorly.  He concluded that, in his opinion, a DAC in that price range should perform/measure better.  He offered to revisit if the company disagrees with his results. 

Maybe one problem is that we have been conditioned to expect that all reviews will be positive.  Even the negative reviews are often carefully scripted so as not to offend.  My problems with the "review" are that there is no mention about how it sounds, and the minor pile-on by other readers is mostly bad form.  However, just because the DAC measured poorly is not a reason to discredit the messenger.