Has hi fi become too specialized


Let me start by saying that my system consists of Two Tandberg 3009A monoblocks(180 watts per side) one Tandberg 3018A preamp, one Tandberg 3001A tuner, a Rega PL25 with Benz Ace MC, a Sony ES 777 SCD, Boston Acoustics A400 speakers, and a couple of Richard Gray 400S power conditioners. All hooked up with Nordost Red Dawn interconnects, Red Dawn speaker cables, and Moray James power cords. I realize that while my system is not the last word in current hi fi, it will also not humiliate itself under a variety of music and conditions. The other day I dropped by my very nice local hi fi dealer to see what was new. I ended up listening to an assortment of Thiel speakers among others. The listening was done under typical audio room (Excellent) conditions, much better than the conditions in my office!! Even under those perfect listening conditions it became apparent that this was a system that would humiliate itself under a wide variety of music(Mozart, Patricia Barber, Louis Armstrong, Tom Petty.... you get the idea!) While this super expensive and set up perfectly system had moments of greatness with some music, it fell flat on it's face with other types of (Less serious) music. My point is most of the older hi fi systems I've listened to do make all types of music an enjoyable experience. The latest hi fi equipment while no doubt advanced is also alot more narrow focused. While listening to all kinds of current " Super Equipment" I have found the same problem. As I get older I find myself exploring types of music that I thought I never would(African, experimental, new wave, electronic, etc..)I like to think my horizons are expanding! When I first bought my gear I did so because classical sounded great on it. Imagine how good I feel about my investment now because it has the ability to make anything I feed it sound good. Back at the dealer when we listened to Tom Petty through the Thiels my ears were bleeding from the stark, harsh, revealing, naked sound of the Thiels. I feel current hi fi is too specialized, what say you.
nocaster

Showing 3 responses by plato

Nocaster, it's not that Hi Fi has become too specialized. It's just that many folks would rather believe that 90 percent of their recordings sound awful rather than admit that their expensive new audio gear could be at fault.

I've owned a wide variety of audio gear in the past 30+ years and the bulk of my recordings sound quite musical and detailed on my systems. But these results take a bit of work and tweaking and proper component synergy... It requires much less effort and energy to simply believe that your gear is so great that it makes all your recordings sound like drek (except those very few "really great recordings").
Well said, Bigtee. I just wanted to add that it is probably to the dealers benefit to feed and encourage the "ruthlessly revealing" school of thought. That way, when the system you just plunked down thousands to own sounds bad he simply says, "Yeah, incredibly revealing, isn't it?" That way, he allows you to believe that that's the way things should be; so he doesn't need to spend time helping you fix the problem(s); and down the road it's easy to get you to upgrade to something "even better."
Stehno, that's the basic nuts and bolts of it, but I tend to think that the AC power rituals are somewhat over-rated.

I don't have and have never had dedicated lines, cryo-treated outlets, or elaborate AC purifying devices in my system (except I once reviewed the PS Audio P300 powerplant). It seems that some of the better AC cables filter out some interference, and some of the better gear has either built-in AC filtering or extensive power-supply regulation or both. Also, some of the AC filtering devices constrict dynamics, which is not a good thing.

Obviously the measures you listed will be more effective in some systems than others. And I've probably been lucky to have relatively clean AC in some of the places I've lived.
Thanks for posting!