I don't purport to be a scientist - or even technical for that matter - but I have a question about the claimed 127db output claim.
According to what I've heard people say on this site, for every 3db increase in output, it takes approximately double the amplification (wattage).
If this is correct, even with the claimed 92db efficiency, it would require approximately 2000 watts per channel at 8ohms to achieve 127db.
If this is peak, maybe I could see it...maybe. But 127db continuous output across the rated frequency response seems a bit unlikely.
Besides, wouldn't 127db result in hearing damage?
As for Sellerwithintegrity's request that you bring your SPL meter to CES - If you attempt to achieve 127db with innocent bystanders anywhere remotely close to your booth, be prepared for the impending lawsuits and negative public sentiment that will surely lead to the company's early demise.
Achieving 127db just for the sake of doing it reminds me of the old joke about why a dog licks his b@##s.
What's the point?
According to what I've heard people say on this site, for every 3db increase in output, it takes approximately double the amplification (wattage).
If this is correct, even with the claimed 92db efficiency, it would require approximately 2000 watts per channel at 8ohms to achieve 127db.
If this is peak, maybe I could see it...maybe. But 127db continuous output across the rated frequency response seems a bit unlikely.
Besides, wouldn't 127db result in hearing damage?
As for Sellerwithintegrity's request that you bring your SPL meter to CES - If you attempt to achieve 127db with innocent bystanders anywhere remotely close to your booth, be prepared for the impending lawsuits and negative public sentiment that will surely lead to the company's early demise.
Achieving 127db just for the sake of doing it reminds me of the old joke about why a dog licks his b@##s.
What's the point?