Lwin, thanks for providing the additional perspective.
George (Jetter), I've owned my XA25 for about five months now, and the early impressions you've probably seen me mention in other threads continue to apply. Basically, I've found
Teajay's review to be absolutely spot-on, and for that matter to be more accurately focused than Herb Reichert's comparably positive
review in Stereophile.
The bottom line IME is that I don't miss the 300B-based VAC Renaissance 70/70 MkIII I had been using during the previous several years at all. The XA25
comes remarkably close to the VAC with respect to dimensionality,
imaging, liquidity, and other traditional fortes of high quality tube
amps. It’s a bit less rich sounding than the VAC, but I interpret that
as an increase in accuracy, which is fine as far as I am concerned.
I should add, though, as you're probably aware, that my speakers (Daedalus Ulysses) are extremely easy to drive, having an unusually flat and benign impedance curve as well as high sensitivity (rated at 97.5 db/1W/1m). Also, in case it matters (which it probably doesn't), most of my listening is to classical music.
Finally, I'll mention that as it happened I didn't have an opportunity to do much critical listening during the week I gave the XA25 the 120 hour breakin that was recommended by Mark at Reno HiFi (from whom I purchased the amp; he was wonderful to deal with, btw). So I can't comment on how its sonics might have changed during that period.
Best regards,
-- Al