Gallo Reference series question


I was hesitant to pose this question, as these forums are really out of my league, but curiosity got the best of me. I'm a newbie preparing to invest in a "low-end" Hi-Fi system. I heard the 3.1s recently and my neophyte ears, and eyes (cringe), were impressed. I've learned from the forums how important the pre-amp, amplifier, cabling, etc. is to the sound quality, in addition to the speakers. So I was wondering- I see a lot of the Reference 3s up for sale for quite a bit less than the 3.1s. Is the difference in sound quality enough that I wouldn't be just as well off getting the 3s and spending the difference on a slightly better amp or preamp? I've been reading your forums a lot (they seem to be the most knowledgeable I've found) and there seems to be a lot of loyalty to older speakers- as opposed to every new incarnation on the market. I don't have the serious money to put in to a system, and maybe never will, so several hundred dollars here or there could make a difference. If anyone wants to give an opinion- I'd gladly listen. I'd like to use the system for both pure audio and some home theater. I also spent 20+ years playing drums, and frankly, my ears aren't brand new if you know what I mean. Sorry for the length of this question.
wmearl1
I've had the original Reference 3s for 4+ years and love them. I've never heard of anyone having a problem with these speakers (though someone must) and recommend that you save some money and buy a used pair. Good luck, Dave
Wmearl1,

It sounds like you've had a favorable experience with the 3.1's. Like Truman, I still own my Gallo Nucleus Reference II's. I drove them with a Sony XA7ES CD player, Jeff Rowland Consummate preamp, and Spectron amplifier. The sound was very satisfying (I had been out of high-end audio for over 25 years at this point).

Best regards,
Sam
Gallo's are an inspiration! (Round sound forever. - This is more a theory of how sound is propagated. A correct one in my estimation.) They do appreciate a healthy dose of power. [ Personally, I bought, sold & re-bought the Nucleus Ref 2's.] Their bass spheres and revolutionary tweeters/ sound like 360 degree ribbons/; fast!
Thanks for your response. You are correct in that I will be building from scratch. I have previously owned "consumer" level stuff- Klipsch, Orb, Integra, but never delved into the next level. There is a lot to learn, it will be a long journey, and hopefully: an entertaining one. Once again, thanks for your opinion on the 3.1s.
You heard the 3.1's and liked them. The 3.1's are great speakers. They are one of my favorite speakers. I will be honest, I've never heard the 3's. People I know that heard both said the 3.1's were much better.

When I built a system the speakers where one of the last purchases I made. I believe the speakers need to match well with the rest of your system. I bring this up because it sounds like you don't own anything yet.

I believe these speakers will match well with most reasonably powered equipment. I drive mine with Canary CA-339's (50 watt per channel). My amps drive the heck out of them. I was not as happy hearing them with 25 watts. I am no lover of the add on sub amp.

I don't think it is easy to find speakers for this little money that have all these have to offer. I would stay with these unless I actually heard and was happy with the 3's.

I believe you will never be sorry if you buy these. Even if you sell them, you will get most of your money back. Enjoy the journey.