Flex: Spectral avoids putting an inductor in the output stage as this reduces rise times and power bandwidth. The end result is that the amp can go into oscillation and destroy itself IF it sees a load that will allow this to happen. By using the appropriate parts to build a zobel, the amp sees a load that it can deal with at high frequencies WITHOUT affecting in-band performance in the least. You get the benefits of the "non-inductor speed & bandwidth" with the stability of a networked cable without the in-band effects that the networks produce. By altering the values of the components used to build the zobel, you can change the hinge frequency as to where it comes into effect.
As to the stability of their amps, i work with RF devices that put out 100's of watts PER DEVICE. Sometimes, these are operating into loads that are phenomenally out of tune in terms of the load impedances that they see and this situation remains consistent over prolonged periods of time. These devices will typically hold their own under horrible conditions.
Now if you take into account that some of these devices are rated for under 100 watts apiece by the manufacturer and we are running them well above that level at extended duty cycles at 25% - 50% above specified operating voltages and less than optimum loads on them and they don't blow up, i would think that Spectral ( or anybody else ) should be able to build a device that can hold up under normal and even somewhat specialized conditions ( Zobel's installed for protection ) without much of a challenge. If they can't do this, they are either technologically challenged or their parts matching is not what it should be. Then again, i've always thought that if the average audio engineer was designing RF circuitry, we'd still be using tin cans and strings for communications. Sean
>
As to the stability of their amps, i work with RF devices that put out 100's of watts PER DEVICE. Sometimes, these are operating into loads that are phenomenally out of tune in terms of the load impedances that they see and this situation remains consistent over prolonged periods of time. These devices will typically hold their own under horrible conditions.
Now if you take into account that some of these devices are rated for under 100 watts apiece by the manufacturer and we are running them well above that level at extended duty cycles at 25% - 50% above specified operating voltages and less than optimum loads on them and they don't blow up, i would think that Spectral ( or anybody else ) should be able to build a device that can hold up under normal and even somewhat specialized conditions ( Zobel's installed for protection ) without much of a challenge. If they can't do this, they are either technologically challenged or their parts matching is not what it should be. Then again, i've always thought that if the average audio engineer was designing RF circuitry, we'd still be using tin cans and strings for communications. Sean
>