Enjoyment

What is 'accurate'?...what is your benchmark for measuring accuracy?....how do you know if your system is more or less accurate than another system?
Judging by your question, it sounds to me that you are at a crossroads in your life and you may be about to make a big mistake.
Sell your stuff now, buy a Parrott and a new birdcage. Train the bird to say 'hifi sucks..I'm so happy'
Invest what's left wisely in drugs and alcohol.

John, I've never sought 'accuracy' as a priority. My priorities are musicality and scale of presentation, the later has the sub category of dimensionality.

Musicality for me happens mostly in the midrange. I crave the full bodied presentation of tubes, which many would argue are inherently inaccurate. What happens at the frequency extremes is not as important to me per se, though one might argue that without high and low frequency extension, realistic scale and dimensionality may not be possible.
Many audiophiles talk about the importance of dynamics in their systems. My experience is that some people tend to combine components that create an overly dynamic sound. Perhaps they are trying to impress others with a 20 minute blast through their CD collection....almost like a showroom system.
For me, an overly dynamic presentation leads to listening fatigue; I prefer a system that is somewhat more laid back, one that I can listen to quite loud for long periods without constantly adjusting the volume.
Give me a warm and lush midrange, a large coherent soundstage with good depth and image size, and good 3-dimensionality of performers within the stage, and I’m a happy camper.
I haven’t reached those goals entirely with my system, though having made many changes over the past year or so; I’m finally getting pretty close.