EMM Labs CDSA SE vs DCS Puccini

Thank you for your answer Jon2020.
I am actually an owner of a CDSA SE, with the last transport (not Philips). I know that there were some problems with the Phillips transport.
My CDSA SE is on sale.
The Puccini uses an Esoteric UMK5 transport.
I just want to know about the sound quality differences of the Puccini compared with the CDSA SE.
Thank you for your help Jon2020, I will have a look on the Trivista.
Regards

Thank you Rcprince for your help!
I love the EMM Labs sonic signature too, because it sounds very natural and realistic.
I will certainly buy an XDS1 on the second hand market but before I wanted to have opinions of the users of Puccini. Because I never had the pleasure to listen to it but I know that it is a good cd/sacd player too. I know that at this level of performance, the choice between one or the other will be more a matter of taste.
I know Playback Design but it is very difficult to find on the used market, and the prices in France are very high ( bought new it costs 19700 euros or more than 27000 $ !!!) as well as for the XDS1 ( 25000 euros more than 35500 $ ! ) but more easy to find on second hand market with more approachable prices.

So I will be patient !
Again thank you for your participation, it's very kind of you.

Hi Dctom

Yes, of course, I know Andreas Koch because as you said he was working with EMM labs a couple of years...
In 2013 he has developped for Nagra their new dsd Dac,It's not nothing !

The inside parts of the PBD MPS 5 are very similar as in the Emm Labs Xds1 as well as the implementation of various circuits. So, I think they will have a very close sonic signature. Althought the MPS 5 seems to sound a bit more like vinyl than the EMM labs. this is what I have understood by reading the various comments on the PlayBack Design. Like you I prefer a one box cdp.
Now I am comforted in my choice for my next cd player, I think I will stay with EMM Labs with the XDS1.

Thank you Dctom