Eminent vs MLs vs Maggies


Have used box speakers for years. Want to switch to electrostatic or planar. Have not listened to Eminent 's LFTs.Read lots of good reviews. Love the sounds of MLs & Maggies. Please enlighten.
ryllau

Showing 1 response by dem

I have owned versions of Quads, MG, M-L’s, and ET’s, but only the MG1.6's and Quads in recent times...all were very good speakers. Regarding the ET's, I think that all of the advantages that current electronics and cables can make in a system verses what I used 10 years ago effect what my recollections are. I owned a pair of the LFT-IV's and the LFT-VI's in the late 80’s and early 90’s, and I still can't recall hearing a faster speaker than either of these two. In a decent size room, they throw a huge soundstage and produce a deep and very fast bottom-end. These speakers “let go of the notes”! I do recall wishing for better upper extension, but that could have also been related to electronics/cabling. Both models were power hungry and I used several amps with them: first, a Counterpoint 220, and later, an Audio Research D-240. I tried an ARC D115 with them, but it really couldn’t drive them. I ordered my LFT-VI’s with Audio-Quest Clear wiring, which I provided, which made a nice improvement over the stock units. I also got a nice improvement on the top-end through bypassing the factory capacitors with .68, .33, and .01mf WonderCaps. That said, I do not know what the current market is for used ET’s, but that may be important to consider if you decide to try them. I hope you can arrange to audition a pair. Good Luck!