Electrostatic versus conventional speakers


I have never heard a pair of electrostatic speakers. With that being said, what are the pros and cons of electrostatics versus conventional speakers. I'm not in the market for speakers but am just curious

Are they superior to conventional speakers? If so, in what ways? Are they sensitive to tube versus solid state amps? Do they have issues with reliability? Etc.
hobbyist_and_reader

Showing 1 response by blindjim


As Lrsky pointed out, there’s been some changes over the last years with flat speakers. No doubt they’ve improved.

From my perspective, they are indeed different. Not better nor worse than any other sort. They seem to have a non directionality about them. Though often IF matched well with amp (s) they image exceptionally well. Better than many box speakers I’ve heard.

They also consume some room geography. They need space to be set up well. Many need substantial power output. Bass is an issue moving from cone types into panels for many.

If you’ve ever heard dipole speakers or IOW omni directional speakers, you have gotten a tip on the sound of electrostats. Very unfatiguing and relaxing sounding transducers whose sound surrounds your ears rather than beats on them.

The only ones I’ve liked were actually hybrids. Powered sub units down below, and panels up top. The Martin Logan Odysseys sounded OK to me… and The top Magnapan sounded ok to me years earlier too. But the sweet spot is tight, the bass won’t ever thunder or impact the way it should, they need space for proper setup.

But they’ll never hurt your ears, image like no body’s business and esthetically will be a real conversation piece…. OOOh… and the bigger … the better in terms of lower end reproduction.