I believe the Acute starts life as an Arcam. Most everything but the DAC chips and transport are done away with and replaced to become the Acute. So whatever the transport is in the Arcam is the one used in the EAR. At least this is what I have read. The tube analog output stage is unique to the Acute and is probably responsible in large part for the sound. Robert Levy of Positive Feedback and Harry Pearson of TAS were both quite taken by this unit. Certain NOS tubes seem to enhance the sound quality and would be worth investigating, just takes 2 so shouldn't be too pricey.
EAR Acute
Heard the Acute today and fell in love with its sound immediately - such glorious midrange and deep layering; full of details without causing ear fatigue! Must be the tube output stage...
Would have bought it on the spot but the build held me back. If it costs $2000, no problem but at $5000, I expect better build quality.
Is there a CDP out there that shares the EAR's glorious sound but better built in the same price range to recommend?
Would have bought it on the spot but the build held me back. If it costs $2000, no problem but at $5000, I expect better build quality.
Is there a CDP out there that shares the EAR's glorious sound but better built in the same price range to recommend?
- ...
- 13 posts total
- 13 posts total