2. analog
  3. 1383428436

Dynavector P75 Mk ii

I'm currently comparing the Dynavector P75 Mk II against my PS Audio GCPH. While the P75 is "quieter", I'm getting a feel that it has just a bit more of an edgy sound than the GCPH. Dynamics and detail are a tad better on the P75, but at the cost of making the sound a bit less "comfortable". I keep going back to the GCPH. My turntable is a VPI Classic 1, with Dynavector 20X2L, running the P75 in phono enhancer mode.

Has anyone else noticed this about the sound signature of the P75?
jwglista

Showing 2 responses by jwglista

jwglista OP
206 posts
 
Thanks for the response.

I am definitely leaning more and more towards the GCPH. The Dyna seems to sound a bit more "hi fi", whereas the GCPH just sounds more like music. The Dyna is, however, a bit quieter in my setup. Although, the hum I was getting when using the GCPH with my previous turntable has seemed to reside a bit after upgrading to the Classic 1. At this point it's very close. For the time being, I will be living with the GCPH. Have had it for about 3 years now and has performed pretty well for me.

I will have to keep the Moon and the Modwright on my list for when it's time for a real upgrade.
jwglista OP
206 posts
 
Dhcod: What is interesting, is yesterday I played around with the damping fluid in the arm of my Classic 1, and that has tamed some of the excessive treble energy that was coming from the 20X2L. Now that I've adjusted that, the P75 may actually sound better. I will have to go back and listen to the P75 again after I've made this tweak. The P75 does sound better from a technical standpoint, but I think it was bringing out that extra treble energy, whereas the GCPH was sort of masking it, with its warmer sonic character.

I don't think I've heard of the PSIII. The GCPH I think is very nice, but it doesn't fair as well with very low output carts like the 20X2L; you can hear noise coming from the speakers.

I will report back with my findings.
More to discover