Unsound, you are totally correct. I noticed that same thing, the Aerials were more dynamic and the Dunlavys more coherent. I also think, it depends on the room you have. The Dunlavy 1V speakers are like 6 feet tall. You need a large room for them. The Aerial 10Ts have a very dynamic upbeat type sound. The bass is amazing. The Bass is very tight and articulate. I also like the Focal Kelvar midbase they use on the 10Ts. Its interesting, I heard the Montana EP speakers at the Stereophile show. It uses 2 8 inch Scanspeak Paper Woofers, 2 4 inch Scanspeak Kelvar midbases and the Scanspeak Tweeter. I thought these speakers were to edgy sounding. The Scanspeak Kelvar midbase didn't sound good. The Focal Kelvar midbase sounds so much more smoother and natural. I would also say, check out the Dunlavy Aletha speakers. There really good.
Dunlavy SC-IV vs. Aerial 10T characteristics
I was wondering if anyone has compared or owned these two speakers?
What charateristics would be different between these two speakers, in other words,what will I get from one speaker that I will not get from the other?
Your insights, views, or speculation is welcomed.
Thanks,
Dan
What charateristics would be different between these two speakers, in other words,what will I get from one speaker that I will not get from the other?
Your insights, views, or speculation is welcomed.
Thanks,
Dan