I would start with one first and focus on the music side. Then play around with placement snd make note of the differences. First placement I would do is set it up behind your seated position. This will expand the sound stage and add depth to the music. I like REL for music as they use A/B amps, I am not a fan of most class D amps for music (they are getting better but not there yet). If you get to 2 channel set to your liking and are not happy with the movie sound then add the second and go through the same set up. Personally I have two separate systems for music and home theater. Share the same room but totally independent jobs.
Dual SVS PB-1000 Pro versus Dual Rythmik LV12F- does Servo Technology Matter.
I have a 10 by 12 room. The room is a closed off bedroom and we plan to live in this house for 30 years or so until we can’t live independently. Equipment will be upgraded over time but we will be using the same room forever. Our AVR is a Denon 3700 and our main speakers are Monitor Audio Silver S6 with matching center. Surrounds are Primus P162. Our previous sub was a BIC V1220.
While the subs will almost certainly work hardest for home theater I do want something that also works well for serious music listening. I primarily listen to classic rock but some jazz and classical does get into my mix now and then.
I am still mostly sold on the SVS but I wonder if the servo technology of the Rythmik might give me somewhat better performance for music.
I realize that dual of either one of these will be a huge jump in performance for us but I am wondering the Rythmik might have advantages for music while still being great for HT.
Other people on other forums have also suggested Outlaw and the Hsu VTF-2 Mk5.
Any thoughts on this, please?
Thanks,