Does anyone care to ask an amplifier designer a technical question? My door is open.


I closed the cable and fuse thread because the trolls were making a mess of things. I hope they dont find me here.

I design Tube and Solid State power amps and preamps for Music Reference. I have a degree in Electrical Engineering, have trained my ears keenly to hear frequency response differences, distortion and pretty good at guessing SPL. Ive spent 40 years doing that as a tech, store owner, and designer.
.
Perhaps someone would like to ask a question about how one designs a successfull amplifier? What determines damping factor and what damping factor does besides damping the woofer. There is an entirely different, I feel better way to look at damping and call it Regulation , which is 1/damping.

I like to tell true stories of my experience with others in this industry.

I have started a school which you can visit at http://berkeleyhifischool.com/ There you can see some of my presentations.

On YouTube go to the Music Reference channel to see how to design and build your own tube linestage. The series has over 200,000 views. You have to hit the video tab to see all.

I am not here to advertise for MR. Soon I will be making and posting more videos on YouTube. I don’t make any money off the videos, I just want to share knowledge and I hope others will share knowledge. Asking a good question is actually a display of your knowledge because you know enough to formulate a decent question.

Starting in January I plan to make these videos and post them on the HiFi school site and hosted on a new YouTube channel belonging to the school.


ramtubes

Showing 4 responses by teo_audio

They left shaking their heads because when they compare the same preamps one at a time they "think" they hear big differences.

They do hear big differences at home. No doubt about it.

Long term listening does reveal bigger differences than short term listening of unfamiliar complex systems, rooms, etc.

Especially unstressed at home ---long term differences being notable -- with the entire home package being a familiar.

Anything else being paraded about....is well, horsepuckey of the most damaging kind.

Read up on listening tests and the human ear. It’s not a machine, it’s biological, and is individual and has learning curves, and these aspects take time. the ear is a living moving changing variable. and different in every single person. Seven billion different sets of hearing.

It even possesses intelligence and capacities levels like minds and IQ. Yet most people don’t mention these entirely obvious realities. Like your eyes, and mind, they come with a almost totally blank page, and you build it out from some very basic starter forms.. You learn your way to hearing, with your individual package that has as much variation in individuals as does IQ.

Bamboozling them with a test that no one can pass, without adequate amount of time spent in front of it, does not substitute for hearing knowledge and skill.

There was no bamboozling and nothing like the pseudoscience you propose on your website. http://www.teoaudio.com/technical/

I ran into you on the cable threads. This thread is about answering questions.

Please leave us alone.


Before you answer a question, you have to define the question.

You failed to properly define the question.

As for the science of fluid metals, bring us your answers for questions you don’t understand.

The world of fundamental physics awaits. 
 
 
You should really be careful about that definition of questions aspect.  As for leaving you alone, I will do as you ask.
Roger nice job handling Teo. IMO he embodies everything that is wrong in high end audio these days.


Some Ignorance is so manifold that it is used to commit to attacks so libelous and underhanded... that the person initiating is practically kicked off a given forum. So obvious to all, that there aren’t even words for it.

And then that illiteracy and ignorance is paraded about as somehow being informed. That we can all be that dense. Jebus. What a horrific world that would be.

So far gone that it can’t even be explained to a given person how far off base and wrongheaded a given comment might be.
Prof uses the measurement canard which is as old as it gets and is well proven to be ineffective when it comes to human hearing at it's limits - which is the subject at hand.

Interestingly enough, his entire job rides on doing things that are either unmeasurable or so close to being unmeasurable that it is not worth bothering to try.

Hoisted by his own petard. (modern translation: he blew himself up)