I got to say there is some fascinating and thought provoking discussion here from all camps! And how eloquent and succinct many of you are in presenting your case.
I have a few thoughts;
1. I find myself leaning toward the cables sound will be influenced by all the variables it encounters. Even though certain construction qualities may have a basic quantifiable effect on the sound I think the myriad other interactions the cable encounters will alter those characteristics significantly.
2. So, I think the cable will sound different from system to system. I even wonder if the sonic qualities would vary at time of day? After all we all have read or experienced "my system sounds better at night?" Purportedly this is attributable to cleaner, less noisy power being supplied to the household. So couldn't it stand to reason the characteristics attributed to the cable may in fact be something else? Even change throughout the day? Same could be said of all the components in a system I suppose.
3. Also if the cable was changed from system to system, and differing brands of cable were used in these systems, couldn't that effect said characteristics? I mean does'nt the change of a component and its reaction to the rest of the system modify the sound?
4. If all these variables effect a single cable, is it not possible it would do the same for complete sets of cables? Although perhaps to a lesser degree. I have no experience experimenting with this but it stands to reason that complete sets of cables by a manufacturer in a system could yield a more cohesive, predictable end product. Being that the cable set is of the same construction throughout therefore sharing the same characteristics.
5. I wonder, if a person experiences or expects certain attributes from a product, wouldn't they be inclined to expect it wherever it may be installed? Especially if it is not a blind test? Is this not an argument made by some in the trade mags?
6. I agree that if a difference made by a product is not readily apparent, then it may be non-existent or so minute that it is not worth the effort.
I am be no means an expert. But have easily heard differences in systems and have to believe that many things influence those differences. Including interactions of components, time of day, enviornment, power supplied, etc.
I enjoy music and listening to it reproduced well. I haven't spent the time nor have the resources to swap out components to ascertain its effect on the sound. Hell my system cost me about 2/3s of what Bryon has in cables, although retailed for more.
Neither am I in a position to offer arguments supporting any side, objective or subjective. But I do find the positions offered by Al, Bryon and others the ones I find most reasonable and agreeable to me.
I am not saying the others are mistaken, one thing I've learned is we all hear things differently, real or perceived. And will continue to do so. Thats what makes this so interesting. And even can teach one something or open our eyes to other trains of thought.
These are just opinions on my part, right or wrong. I look forward to continued debate.
Again, what a great thread.
Best,
Dave
I have a few thoughts;
1. I find myself leaning toward the cables sound will be influenced by all the variables it encounters. Even though certain construction qualities may have a basic quantifiable effect on the sound I think the myriad other interactions the cable encounters will alter those characteristics significantly.
2. So, I think the cable will sound different from system to system. I even wonder if the sonic qualities would vary at time of day? After all we all have read or experienced "my system sounds better at night?" Purportedly this is attributable to cleaner, less noisy power being supplied to the household. So couldn't it stand to reason the characteristics attributed to the cable may in fact be something else? Even change throughout the day? Same could be said of all the components in a system I suppose.
3. Also if the cable was changed from system to system, and differing brands of cable were used in these systems, couldn't that effect said characteristics? I mean does'nt the change of a component and its reaction to the rest of the system modify the sound?
4. If all these variables effect a single cable, is it not possible it would do the same for complete sets of cables? Although perhaps to a lesser degree. I have no experience experimenting with this but it stands to reason that complete sets of cables by a manufacturer in a system could yield a more cohesive, predictable end product. Being that the cable set is of the same construction throughout therefore sharing the same characteristics.
5. I wonder, if a person experiences or expects certain attributes from a product, wouldn't they be inclined to expect it wherever it may be installed? Especially if it is not a blind test? Is this not an argument made by some in the trade mags?
6. I agree that if a difference made by a product is not readily apparent, then it may be non-existent or so minute that it is not worth the effort.
I am be no means an expert. But have easily heard differences in systems and have to believe that many things influence those differences. Including interactions of components, time of day, enviornment, power supplied, etc.
I enjoy music and listening to it reproduced well. I haven't spent the time nor have the resources to swap out components to ascertain its effect on the sound. Hell my system cost me about 2/3s of what Bryon has in cables, although retailed for more.
Neither am I in a position to offer arguments supporting any side, objective or subjective. But I do find the positions offered by Al, Bryon and others the ones I find most reasonable and agreeable to me.
I am not saying the others are mistaken, one thing I've learned is we all hear things differently, real or perceived. And will continue to do so. Thats what makes this so interesting. And even can teach one something or open our eyes to other trains of thought.
These are just opinions on my part, right or wrong. I look forward to continued debate.
Again, what a great thread.
Best,
Dave