Agear, they are not even theories, they are hypotheses. In other words, a guess. The reason you never see any supporting evidence or documentation for his products is because there is none. No scientist has bought any of them and said "Wow, this is going to change the world!" or "This thing really works." I am not talking six moons or any end users. I mean real scientists that can peer review something like this. That would be how real scientific discoveries are validated. Geoff would never allow that to happen because the fraud would be exposed.
Do equipment stands have an impact on electronics?
Mechanical grounding or isolation from vibration has been a hot topic as of late. Many know from experience that footers, stands and other vibration technologies impact things that vibrate a lot like speakers, subs or even listening rooms (my recent experience with an "Energy room"). The question is does it have merit when it comes to electronics and if so why? Are there plausible explanations for their effect on electronics or suggested measurement paradigms to document such an effect?
Showing 2 responses by csmgolf
What is the difference between a hypothesis and a theory? | CARM https://carm.org/difference-hypothesis-theoryA hypothesis is an attempt to explain phenomena. ... A theory is the result of testing a hypothesisand developing an explanation that is assumed to be true about something. A theory replaces thehypothesis after testing confirms the hypothesis, or the hypothesis is modified and tested ...
No they are not the same thing. A readily accepted and thoroughly tested hypothesis becomes a theory. Of course you had to try to deflect to something else to avoid the point of the post. Pretty typical. Google sure is a great thing. Pretty much every reply to the query said the same thing, but you knew that, didn't you? When will any of your products ever get to the point of being a theory instead of a guess? |