Do CD treatments improve rips?


Has anyone done any comparison testing between untreated CDs ripped to hard drive, that are subsequently treated (examples: polishing, demagnetizing, ionizing, Nespa-ing, edge-marking or beveling, copying to CD-R, using disc mats) and then re-ripped (using the same ripping software to the same hard drive)? I'm interested in knowing if the two rips are identical bit-wise (verification software), and also if they sound exactly alike. If you've done this comparison, could you also let us know the hardware and software involved? Thanks!
jharrell

Showing 2 responses by kijanki

I rip using MAX (Mac) with CDParanoia option "don't allow to skip" selected. Computer reads music disk as data disk with proper check-sums (zero errors).
Hoff48 - I'm not sure that Itunes rips bit perfect. My Itunes rips on Mac, with error correction activated, CDs that are not readable by MAX set to "not allow to skip option". Error correction on music CDs is pretty loose and the only way to read it bit-perfect is to read it as a data - as MAX does and Itunes doesn't.