Mitch asks:
So, my question is, as you go up the pre-pro price chain starting at $1500, does the processing get proportionately better, or is performance of the 2-channel getting markedly better?
---------
I did a fair bit of research on this question about 2 years ago. I was looking for a pre-pro to replace my ARC LS-25 in a 2.2 channel, music only system because I had added subwoofers and the involved x-over hardware I was using (don't ask) involved multiple boxes and had become a PITA. I don't use the video functions at all, so the following conclusion is limited to audio performance.
Based on reasonably extensive (tho by no means exhaustive) auditioning of pre-pros at many price points, I reached the following conclusion:
If you're using the pre-pro in X.1 or X.2 channel configurations with a digital source and using the internal software to effect the x-over (and likely room correction) in the digital domain, I found little to no audible improvement as the price of the pre-pro goes up from the $1500-$2000 range (where top-line software is employed).
If you switch to the "analog direct" option, it's a much harder call, particularly if you're using analog sources. At some auditions, I felt like the difference in A/B was pretty material, at others, much less so. I knew that I was not likely to go the all analog route very often (deeply spoiled by the convenience of my Q-Sonix server), so I went with a $1500ish Onkyo 5508.
Reiterating: This is just my personal take...and one based on an extensive, tho by necessity limited sample of A/B comparisons of the lower vs higher priced pre-pros.
Marty
So, my question is, as you go up the pre-pro price chain starting at $1500, does the processing get proportionately better, or is performance of the 2-channel getting markedly better?
---------
I did a fair bit of research on this question about 2 years ago. I was looking for a pre-pro to replace my ARC LS-25 in a 2.2 channel, music only system because I had added subwoofers and the involved x-over hardware I was using (don't ask) involved multiple boxes and had become a PITA. I don't use the video functions at all, so the following conclusion is limited to audio performance.
Based on reasonably extensive (tho by no means exhaustive) auditioning of pre-pros at many price points, I reached the following conclusion:
If you're using the pre-pro in X.1 or X.2 channel configurations with a digital source and using the internal software to effect the x-over (and likely room correction) in the digital domain, I found little to no audible improvement as the price of the pre-pro goes up from the $1500-$2000 range (where top-line software is employed).
If you switch to the "analog direct" option, it's a much harder call, particularly if you're using analog sources. At some auditions, I felt like the difference in A/B was pretty material, at others, much less so. I knew that I was not likely to go the all analog route very often (deeply spoiled by the convenience of my Q-Sonix server), so I went with a $1500ish Onkyo 5508.
Reiterating: This is just my personal take...and one based on an extensive, tho by necessity limited sample of A/B comparisons of the lower vs higher priced pre-pros.
Marty