When a Individual Adopts the intention to have a Bearing created being as Optimised as they can create as a performer.
Even if this is a discipline restricted to having a look within the Bearing Housing at the lubrication Condition/ Exchange Lubrication on a Yearly - One and Half Yearly - Two Yearly task to be carried out, the Thrust Pad can be inspected at these times.
There is little info to be seen where Thrust Pad Wear has been witnessed, to suggest even a Thrust Pad with a much increased point loading will be subject to excessive wear at this timeline. There is only a very small cost to be incurred, if periodically a Thrust Pad is exchanged, even if a Thrust Pad in use, is showing no evidence of wear that is a detriment to the performance.
I do suggest that a Sapphire Selected as Material will create a condition within the Bearing Housing that pretty much needs the set up to not undergo a transportation. A Trust Pad could receive an impact from the Spindle through being in transit, which could lead to a Sapphire Part fracturing. I put Sapphire on the materials option as there is not better to create the lowest coefficient of friction and least drag. Look at the modern TT's, Sapphire is on their materials used list.
More robust parts selected to be in use, are not a concern to be selected, only downside being a lesser low friction and drag will be the outcome.
Assuming the average TT owner, especially TT owners with TT;s in use with multiple of years of usage and potentially never having received an investigation/service of a Platter Spindle Bearing, has the outcome where the owner is likely to to consider / adopt such methods, as to use new materials and change interface tolerances with intent to change the design for the TT’s Bearing Assembly is wishful thinking.
Over multiple years, I have as a guestimate had a dialogue with 50ish People through forum activity, where like minded individuals have expressed a keenness of of interest when it comes to Bearing Servicing.
Tighten that down to between 15 - 25 like minded individuals when it comes to expressing a keenness to learn more about Bearing redesign concepts and achieving a design.
Tighten that down to a handful+ when it comes to the actual work being carried out, and not all individuals expressing the interest are intending on carrying out any of the work. The most valuable work undertaken in this area, is done by the hand of a few only.
In recent times it has been learnt, especially within the past few years, due conditions of a Vintage TT when in use, there is different conditions discovered to the wear witnessed on a Vintage TT’s.
Not one TT can be the model to produce a Pattern Part for all sibling models.
The learning shows, each TT is needing to be dimension checked and Bespoke Parts are likely to be required to produce the tolerances wanted to be used, when it comes to the Bush/Spindle Interface. This means to get the interface with precision, a Bearing Housing and Spindle needs to be with the Machinist for their producing and fitting the parts. This does make the option more limiting if the wanted success is to be the outcome.
There is not too much of a concern for the Thrust Pad Interface, choices made are transferrable without complication if another wants to adopt the method.
For the Thrust Pad, I have seen Bowling Balls machined down to be the Parts, which turns out Parts in use are Lignum Vitae Wood.
For the Base of the Bearing Housing I have seen new Sump Caps produced, that allow for the Base of the Bearing Housing to be rigidly anchored through additional fastening options being used with the design for the new sump cap.
The anchoring has also be seen to work like a drain, where energies are transferred through a tie rod into a hefty brass foot and oil compacted sand.
Once the concepts start flowing some ideas go for the controlling any flexion of the Bearing Housing prior to concerning one self about the internals of the bearing housing.
To date I would strongly suggest the most rigidly secured bearing housings where flexion is potentially not present are belonging to those seen on Kaneta Design SP 10 Mk II and a Yamaha GT Model. My own assessments suggest all typical designs for a Bearing Housing, especially on a JVEDDTT, where a Stator Bowl is in use, are all potentially showing a flexion. Some Stator Bowls are pressed from Metal less than 1mm (1/32").
The Kaneta design I have in use, has advantages as the new produced Panzerholz Plinth/ Chassis is designed to have the Stator Bowl and Projection of the Bearing Housing couple together as an interference fit. A notion is on the table to produce a new design sump cap and have a tie rod drain option, but as the design lends itself to a whole new design for the bearing parts and assembly, the focus is on a new bearing design.