I'm one who is skeptical of all the claims made about the "improved" sound from the streaming sources such as Roon. Aside from music recorded in the last few years, that actually takes advantage of all that pure digital recording can offer, most of what we are listening to has been recorded on a 24 track (?) system, onto 2 inch tape. Then it's been mixed onto another 2 inch tape and finally the "master" copy has been recorded onto a 3rd tape. From this master, vinyl and CD's have been produced. There is no system in the world that can get any sound in the future that is not present on the master tape. I doubt very much that Roon is steaming from the original masters, so that means they are using whatever source is at hand. You just have to listen to a CD that was "re mastered" from a dubious source to know that there is a lot of crap out there. I think in the world of audio, there's a lot of Kool-Aid being offered and we all drink a bit of it? Me included.
Deja Vu all over again
The Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young remastered album is available on Qobuz for streaming at 192kHz 24bit. It sounds great. I have the original vinyl that I bought in the late 70s. This remastered version has a very crisp clean sound with good soundstage depth and width. I especially like the song, "Almost Cut my Hair". The song seems almost comical to me at the beginning but the mood changes for me as the song continues into a serious and good discussion.
I believe this digital version has little to no compression since I have my preamp volume set at 50 for my normal listening level. Compare that to some pop albums on Qobuz at 44kHz 16bit that I play at a volume level of 27-33.
I believe the compression level is proportional to the volume level I use for my normal listening level. For example, ROON shows the dynamic range of each of my CDs that I have ripped as FLAC files into my Library. I see dynamic range as low as 8 and as high as 18. The 18 is for a Telarc CD and is exceptional. I notice my volume level for normal listening level is correlating to this Dynamic Range value. Of course the higher dynamic range recordings have some nice loud peaks.
I believe this digital version has little to no compression since I have my preamp volume set at 50 for my normal listening level. Compare that to some pop albums on Qobuz at 44kHz 16bit that I play at a volume level of 27-33.
I believe the compression level is proportional to the volume level I use for my normal listening level. For example, ROON shows the dynamic range of each of my CDs that I have ripped as FLAC files into my Library. I see dynamic range as low as 8 and as high as 18. The 18 is for a Telarc CD and is exceptional. I notice my volume level for normal listening level is correlating to this Dynamic Range value. Of course the higher dynamic range recordings have some nice loud peaks.