2. digital
  3. 1204516261

DAC1 or DAC1 USB?

I have decided to try out the DAC1 in my system. Does anyone have any experience with both versions of the DAC1? I have been told by Benchmark that a few things were changed from DAC1 to DAC1 USB but I find it hard to justify a 30% increase in price especially when I do not plan on actully using the USB option at least for now. Any thoughts? Thanks in advance.

My very modest setup:

NAD (5 disc changer)
Stratos Amp
Harbeth 7ES II Speakers
Rotel 1055 (used as peamp, looking to use the DAC1 as a pre and dac)
kego

Showing 5 responses by chenc

chenc
23 posts
 
INTO A DAC1 of course. Come on, guys. Are you messing with me? So far the only DAC mentioned here is the DAC1 and its USB version.
chenc
23 posts
 
It just occurred to me I did not put "the" in front of "usb and coax" that might be the reason for losing you.
chenc
23 posts
 
The USB is connected to a computer of course. And the same album (ripped lossless into the HD) was used to compare.
chenc
23 posts
 
I have compared using USB and coax and we (my girlfriend and I) both agree that using Cal Audio Delta transport sounds better. I thought it's noticeably better, and she said "of course it's better."
What's $300? That's about 1/4 a Macbook which you can use to feed the DAC1 Macbook via optical out (next time you are looking to get a computer).
chenc
23 posts
 
If you don't use the USB feature there is really no reason to buy the USB version - at all. The important features (e.g. output impedance) of both are up to date for both (I think) - best call Benchmark, must better than waiting for someone to relay potentially inaccurate info.
More to discover