2. amps-preamps
  3. 119462-68346

Current NAD integrated amps, what are your impressions?

I just picked up a C326BEE and wanted to hear if my results are common, or what the general consensus is for NAD. I did some searching on this forum, but there doesn’t seem to be a lot of love or threads directed at NAD.

I actually acquired a C372 about 3 years ago, but sold it within a year as it seemed pretty bland and laid back. I’ve heard that this vintage wasn’t as reliable and my remote control did die. When I shipped it to the buyer it showed up DOA in one channel! I helped him with the repairs but it left me with reservations regarding NAD. From what I can gather, the current models are much more reliable.

So Spearit sound is clearing out refurbished NAD components, and I couldn’t resist the price(no affiliation). Bottom line, the 326 sounds way better than I expected. I’d been using a Denon AVR3801 in 2 channel with a second system, and the imaging, clarity and punch is easily better with the 326. I’m driving Tannoy DC4 bookshelf speakers and what a soundstage!. Diana Krall tracks are recorded with the piano mic’d so the lower register starts in the left speaker and the highest notes in the right. I’d not heard that with the Denon, but the 326 sets it out so clearly.

So what has your experience been with NAD?
213runnin
mesch
3,481 posts
 
I believe the 320 was predecessor to the 325 which was in turn predecessor to the 326. Possible that they differ in ability to provide power. Also possible that these speakers possess different load characteristics. 

What is the sensitivity for the Rainmakers and Dreamcatchers?
Also, though both are rated as nominal 4 ohms they could represent quite different impedance loads across frequency range. And then there is phase angle.

What are thoughts on the use of the soft clipping function?


ben4
4 posts
 
Here are the Stereophile measurements for the two speakers for anyone who would like to take a look:

http://www.stereophile.com/content/totem-dreamcatcher-loudspeaker-measurements#mhWMgPW5ot0w4PPA.97


ben4
4 posts
 
Don't know why the second link didn't show up.  Here are the measurements for the Rainmaker:

http://www.stereophile.com/content/totem-acoustic-rainmaker-loudspeaker-measurements#1131Xo6Z3TuQhOER.97
mesch
3,481 posts
 
Thanks ben!  I was going to look them up. It seems to me that the amplifier load that these 2 speakers represent are similar with the Rainmaker being slightly more difficult.

I believe the B&W 685s are somewhat easier to drive however not exceptionally so. I have never turned the gain on my 326 past 11 driving them. That is quite loud with my system set up outside on the deck.

Back in 1982 I bought a NAD 3050, the 50wpc version of the infamous 3020. I know 2 people who still have functioning units. 35 years later.
ben4
4 posts
 
The dealer from whom I purchased the Rainmakers also carried PSB speakers, and I listened to the Imagine B, which was relatively new then. The Rainmaker clearly required more juice from the amp than did the PSB.
It's great to hear about those long-lived NADs.

More to discover