Project whistleblower doctors and nurses are saying vaccine deaths are not being tracked, and are being swept under the rug. Injuries are in the millions. I personally know 5 people that have been injured..2 of them severely. Also know of 2 people that have had suspected vaccine induced fatal heart attacks. This is just anecdotal evidence from my circle of people.
Taking this vaccine at this point is like playing Russian Roulette. |
Increases in COVID-19 are unrelated to levels of vaccination across 68 countries and 2947 counties in the United States
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8481107/This study that just got published is saying some crazy stuff Death and Hospitalization rates increased in the vaccinated, and cases increased in places that are more vaccinated than in places where the uptake is less. "the CDC reported an increase from 0.01 to 9% and 0 to 15.1% (between January to May 2021) in the rates of hospitalizations and deaths, respectively, amongst the fully vaccinated [ 10]." At the country-level, there appears to be no discernable relationship between percentage of population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases in the last 7 days (Fig. 1). In fact, the trend line suggests a marginally positive association such that countries with higher percentage of population fully vaccinated have higher COVID-19 cases per 1 million people. Notably, Israel with over 60% of their population fully vaccinated had the highest COVID-19 cases per 1 million people in the last 7 days. The lack of a meaningful association between percentage population fully vaccinated and new COVID-19 cases is further exemplified, for instance, by comparison of Iceland and Portugal. Both countries have over 75% of their population fully vaccinated and have more COVID-19 cases per 1 million people than countries such as Vietnam and South Africa that have around 10% of their population fully vaccinated. Across the US counties too, the median new COVID-19 cases per 100,000 people in the last 7 days is largely similar across the categories of percent population fully vaccinated (Fig. 2). Notably there is also substantial county variation in new COVID-19 cases within categories of percentage population fully vaccinated. There also appears to be no significant signaling of COVID-19 cases decreasing with higher percentages of population fully vaccinated (Fig. 3). Of the top 5 counties that have the highest percentage of population fully vaccinated (99.9–84.3%), the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 4 of them as “High” Transmission counties. Chattahoochee (Georgia), McKinley (New Mexico), and Arecibo (Puerto Rico) counties have above 90% of their population fully vaccinated with all three being classified as “High” transmission. Conversely, of the 57 counties that have been classified as “low” transmission counties by the CDC, 26.3% (15) have percentage of population fully vaccinated below 20%. Since full immunity from the vaccine is believed to take about 2 weeks after the second dose, we conducted sensitivity analyses by using a 1-month lag on the percentage population fully vaccinated for countries and US counties. The above findings of no discernable association between COVID-19 cases and levels of fully vaccinated was also observed when we considered a 1-month lag on the levels of fully vaccinated (Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Figure 2). We should note that the COVID-19 case data is of confirmed cases, which is a function of both supply (e.g., variation in testing capacities or reporting practices) and demand-side (e.g., variation in people’s decision on when to get tested) factors. The sole reliance on vaccination as a primary strategy to mitigate COVID-19 and its adverse consequences needs to be re-examined, especially considering the Delta (B.1.617.2) variant and the likelihood of future variants. Other pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions may need to be put in place alongside increasing vaccination rates. Such course correction, especially with regards to the policy narrative, becomes paramount with emerging scientific evidence on real world effectiveness of the vaccines. For instance, in a report released from the Ministry of Health in Israel, the effectiveness of 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine against preventing COVID-19 infection was reported to be 39% [6], substantially lower than the trial efficacy of 96% [7]. It is also emerging that immunity derived from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine may not be as strong as immunity acquired through recovery from the COVID-19 virus [8]. A substantial decline in immunity from mRNA vaccines 6-months post immunization has also been reported [9]. Even though vaccinations offers protection to individuals against severe hospitalization and death, the CDC reported an increase from 0.01 to 9% and 0 to 15.1% (between January to May 2021) in the rates of hospitalizations and deaths, respectively, amongst the fully vaccinated [10]. In summary, even as efforts should be made to encourage populations to get vaccinated it should be done so with humility and respect. Stigmatizing populations can do more harm than good. Importantly, other non-pharmacological prevention efforts (e.g., the importance of basic public health hygiene with regards to maintaining safe distance or handwashing, promoting better frequent and cheaper forms of testing) needs to be renewed in order to strike the balance of learning to live with COVID-19 in the same manner we continue to live a 100 years later with various seasonal alterations of the 1918 Influenza virus. |
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/counties-with-the-highest-covid-19-vaccination-rate-in-geor...to the people accusing this study of having fake numbers. #1. Chattahoochee County- Population that is fully vaccinated: 99.9% (26,567 fully vaccinated) --- 162.9% higher vaccination rate than Georgia - Population over 65 that is fully vaccinated: 99.9% (1,775 fully vaccinated) --- 38.9% higher vaccination rate than Georgia - Cumulative deaths per 100k: 156 (17 total deaths) --- 23.5% less deaths per 100k residents than Georgia - Cumulative cases per 100k: 44,109 (4,811 total cases) --- 304.5% more cases per 100k residents than Georgia |
https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/medical/counties-with-the-highest-covid-19-vaccination-rate-in-new-...Also for the people claiming numbers are fake in that study. Please learn to do better research. #1. McKinley County- Population that is fully vaccinated: 96.0% (68,537 fully vaccinated) --- 57.6% higher vaccination rate than New Mexico - Population over 65 that is fully vaccinated: 99.9% (11,539 fully vaccinated) --- 13.0% higher vaccination rate than New Mexico - Cumulative deaths per 100k: 685 (489 total deaths) --- 214.2% more deaths per 100k residents than New Mexico - Cumulative cases per 100k: 18,762 (13,390 total cases) --- 65.0% more cases per 100k residents than New Mexico These are the credentials of the authors. 1Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Cambridge, MA USA2Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA USA3Turner Fenton Secondary School, Brampton, ON CanadaS. V. Subramanian, Email: ude.dravrah.hpsh@marbusvs.Corresponding author. |
@jond
I don’t think you know how statistics work... plus you have a very hard time it seems to admit that you were wrong about something.
The researchers from "Harvard" looked at data from all around the world (data is cited) and came to the conclusion that deaths, hospitalizations and cases increased as a whole in conjunction with higher vaccine uptake.
Both counties saw an increase in cases, 304% and 65%
In one county deaths were up 214% and decreased by 23.5 in comparison to state averages.
They are two data points out of Thousands.
I am not going to respond to your posts again, I have no interest in arguing with you about peer reviewed published studies, where all the data is publicly available and cited.
Follow the science as they say :) |
I am going to say this for the last time, and then gonna take my leave. The study I presented is a statistical analysis of publicly available and verifiable data. The researchers took data put out by world Governments, and the CDC, and plotted it on a graph.
It is not some esoteric experiment that the lay person cannot repeat, or a controlled study where the parameters or control groups can be manipulated.
It is PUBLICLY AVAILABLE VERIFIABLE DATA, that you can gather on your own, that is coming straight from the authorities themselves.
This study is not open to interpretation, so unless you are saying that these numbers are fraudulent, this "IS" the correlation between vaccine uptake and...Deaths, Cases and Hospitalizations. All have gone up in places with higher vaccine uptake, tooooo many data points are present to be skewed by individual or regional irregularities. |
@mahgister They keep defending untested experimental vaccines made by some of the most corrupt Pharmaceutical companies on the face of the planet. Pfizer, J&J are repeat offenders and have been convicted of all kinds of fraud. It’s not a question of evidence anymore, they have made this a political issue, and it’s about owning the "Trumptards", and they will sacrifice their own kids to prove the point. It’s a cult. Pfizer has been a “habitual offender,” persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results. Since 2002 the company and its subsidiaries have been assessed $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards. Straight from the NIH. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2875889/#:~:text=Pfizer%20has%20been%20a%20%E2%80%9Chab.... |
@mahgister Leave it be... these people are
well past the point of talking to, They have taken the vaccines themselves, and no matter
what new information comes out, they
will not change their minds unless they experience these side effects for themselves.
winter is coming, it's best to take this time to prepare yourself and your family for the chaos that is now inevitable.
Prepare....Stock foods, provisions, ammo, whatever else you think you might need.
Arguing on comment boards at this point is a fool's errand.
Take care of yourself, and your loved ones.
Prepare. |
@ghasley Ask Pfizer. That is your master now, you have no choice... if Master says 3 boosters, you get in line. If Master says 8, you’d better roll up them sleeves no questions asked.
Pfizer knows all. It is omnipotent. |
@invalid the increases are counted week over week, of the same county vs same county, same country over same country. It is not an Africa vs US situation, it is an Africa vs Africa data set. Year over Year, Covid cases and Deaths in August are up 300%, despite vaccinations being administered to well over half the population, and the most vulnerable population being almost completely vaccinated. The vaccine has failed by any and all abject measures. (AND THAT IS
WHY BOOSTETRS ARE BEING MANDATED) P.S. Read the methodology used in the study Methods We used COVID-19 data provided by the Our World in Data for cross-country analysis, available as of September 3, 2021 (Supplementary Table 1) [4]. We included 68 countries that met the following criteria: had second dose vaccine data available; had COVID-19 case data available; had population data available; and the last update of data was within 3 days prior to or on September 3, 2021. For the 7 days preceding September 3, 2021 we computed the COVID-19 cases per 1 million people for each country as well as the percentage of population that is fully vaccinated. For the county-level analysis in the US, we utilized the White House COVID-19 Team data [5], available as of September 2, 2021 (Supplementary Table 2). We excluded counties that did not report fully vaccinated population percentage data yielding 2947 counties for the analysis. We computed the number and percentages of counties that experienced an increase in COVID-19 cases by levels of the percentage of people fully vaccinated in each county. The percentage increase in COVID-19 cases was calculated based on the difference in cases from the last 7 days and the 7 days preceding them. For example, Los Angeles county in California had 18,171 cases in the last 7 days (August 26 to September 1) and 31,616 cases in the previous 7 days (August 19–25), so this county did not experience an increase of cases in our dataset. We provide a dashboard of the metrics used in this analysis that is updated automatically as new data is made available by the White House COVID-19 Team (https://tiny.cc/USDashboard). |
Ivermectin is being used in over 50 countries to treat Covid. The FDA is pushing vaccines and Remdesivir.... Remdesivir was found in 2016 Ebola trials to have about a 30% Renal Failure induced fatality rate, over the other 3 drugs being used. The Analysis was so alarming that they stopped using it in the middle of the trials.....LET THAT SINK IT FOR A MINUTE. Remdesivir has been standard protocol for covid hospitalized patients since the beginning of the pandemic, and it is not FDA approved. It is being used under EUA. The worst outcome for covid hospitalization in the entire world is in.........yes the good ol US of A. (Not Africa, Not Afhanistan) but the United States of America. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1910993Ivermectin won a nobel prize in 2015, and is one of the safest drugs to have been used for humans with an extremely low toxicity. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3043740/Yeah, up is seriously down. |
It really is.
I think this is exactly how Galileo felt when the science of his time was settled, and people made jokes at his expense instead of looking at the evidence.
The hubris pouring out of some of the posters here is caustic to the Human soul.
Gives me Shivers.
|
The head researcher of Pfizer, on live TV, admitted that they gave the placebo group the vaccines, half
way through the trial. That this had become a humanitarian issue, and keeping the vaccine from these people
was no longer ethical.
He SAID THIS ON LIVE TV. They got rid of the control group.
I don't trust anything these people have to say about controlled trials of this vaccine. They are Liars of the highest magnitude, and are committing outright fraud.
|
@pesky_wabbit thank you for your input. Not interested in any back and forth with you.
Vaccine approval takes 10- 15 years for a reason, you are okay with 6 months, and blatant violations of testing protocols. I am not... we might as well be on different planets, hell galaxies.
This conversation will not go anywhere...
|
Th trial started on July 27, 2020, and was scheduled to go till June of 2023. They destroyed their placebo group in 6 months...... The approval was based on this study.... that has NO CONTROL GROUP.
if you don’t find that troubling......get your child in line to get the next shot, and please leave the rest of us alone.
Regardless, all the efficacy numbers you are hearing about the vaccine effectiveness are all bunk.
THERE IS NO CONTROL GROUP.
90%, 70%, 45%......it’s all advertising/propaganda. |
https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2021/02/19/969143015/long-term-studies-of-covid-19-vaccine...I’ll try to find the video. YouTube has been mass deleting everything...... to protect us all. " Tens of thousands of people who volunteered to be in studies of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines are still participating in follow-up research. But some key questions won’t be easily answered, because many people who had been in the placebo group have now opted to take the vaccine." "
Mott was one of about 650 volunteers who took the experimental Moderna vaccine at a company called Johnson County Clinical Trials in Lenexa, Kan. Dr. Carlos Fierro, who runs the study there, says every participant was called back after the Food and Drug Administration authorized the vaccine. "During that visit we discussed the options, which included staying in the study without the vaccine," he says, "and amazingly there were people — a couple of people — who chose that." He suspects those individuals got spooked by rumors about the vaccine. But everybody else who had the placebo shot went ahead and got the actual vaccine. So now Fierro has essentially no comparison group left for the ongoing study. "It's a loss from a scientific standpoint, but given the circumstances I think it's the right thing to do," he says."
Mott was one of about 650 volunteers who took the experimental Moderna vaccine at a company called Johnson County Clinical Trials in Lenexa, Kan. Dr. Carlos Fierro, who runs the study there, says every participant was called back after the Food and Drug Administration authorized the vaccine."
"Fierro sees another possibility. Perhaps in a year or two the existing vaccines will have proven so effective that COVID-19 becomes not much more than a nuisance. Under those circumstances, the risk of participating in a study that has a placebo option would be low enough to be acceptable, say, for young people who have not yet been vaccinated."
|
https://www.yahoo.com/news/pfizers-covid-19-immunity-protection-032404881.html Pfizer’s COVID-19 immunity protection diminishes after 2 months, and it can reach as low as 20% after 4 months: studies Get ready for shots every month.
And if you believe any of those numbers from Pfizer... that has a criminal history, of falsifying research...... please take 10 of these shots, all in one sitting. Pfizer has been a “habitual offender,” persistently engaging in illegal and corrupt marketing practices, bribing physicians and suppressing adverse trial results. Since 2002 the company and its subsidiaries have been assessed $3 billion in criminal convictions, civil penalties and jury awards. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov › articles › PMC2875889
|
One man's contextuality.... is another man's fraud.
And this has never been done in the history of Clinical research, and to make this abomination mandatory....Forced at the point of a gun.
Yeah.... |
Operation Lockstep
written in 2010. https://principia-scientific.com/2010-rockefellers-operation-lockstep-predicted-2020-lockdown/https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdfPDF version is linked above^^^^
The “Lock Step” scenario is the first of four narratives presented in the Rockefeller Foundation’s summary document, “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development”. It deals with a zoonotic viral pandemic that wipes out millions across the globe. It’s not that long of a read, so let’s just take a quick walk through it, because it is indeed very eye-opening. The details are worth knowing. “A new influenza strain — originating from wild geese — was extremely virulent and deadly. Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20 percent of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them healthy young adults. The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies: international mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains. Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers. The pandemic blanketed the planet — though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America, where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols. But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge. The United States’s initial policy of “strongly discouraging” citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S. but across borders. However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery. China’s government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect its citizens from risk and exposure. During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body-temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems — from pandemics and transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty — leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power. At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in the ways they saw fit. In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth. Across the developing world, however, the story was different — and much more variable. Top-down authority took different forms in different countries, hinging largely on the capacity, caliber, and intentions of their leaders. In countries with strong and thoughtful leaders, citizens’ overall economic status and quality of life increased. In India, for example, air quality drastically improved after 2016, when the government outlawed high-emitting vehicles. In Ghana, the introduction of ambitious government programs to improve basic infrastructure and ensure the availability of clean water for all her people led to a sharp decline in water-borne diseases. But more authoritarian leadership worked less well — and in some cases tragically — in countries run by irresponsible elites who used their increased power to pursue their own interests at the expense of their citizens. There were other downsides, as the rise of virulent nationalism created new hazards: spectators at the 2018 World Cup, for example, wore bulletproof vests that sported a patch of their national flag. Strong technology regulations stifled innovation, kept costs high, and curbed adoption. In the developing world, access to “approved” technologies increased but beyond that remained limited: the locus of technology innovation was largely in the developed world, leaving many developing countries on the receiving end of technologies that others consider “best” for them. Some governments found this patronizing and refused to distribute computers and other technologies that they scoffed at as “second hand.” Meanwhile, developing countries with more resources and better capacity began to innovate internally to fill these gaps on their own. Meanwhile, in the developed world, the presence of so many top-down rules and norms greatly inhibited entrepreneurial activity. Scientists and innovators were often told by governments what research lines to pursue and were guided mostly toward projects that would make money (e.g., market-driven product development) or were “sure bets” (e.g., fundamental research), leaving more risky or innovative research areas largely untapped. Well-off countries and monopolistic companies with big research and development budgets still made significant advances, but the IP behind their breakthroughs remained locked behind strict national or corporate protection. Russia and India imposed stringent domestic standards for supervising and certifying encryption-related products and their suppliers — a category that in reality meant all IT innovations. The U.S. and EU struck back with retaliatory national standards, throwing a wrench in the development and diffusion of technology globally. Especially in the developing world, acting in one’s national self-interest often meant seeking practical alliances that fit with those interests — whether it was gaining access to needed resources or banding together in order to achieve economic growth. In South America and Africa, regional and sub-regional alliances became more structured. Kenya doubled its trade with southern and eastern Africa, as new partnerships grew within the continent. China’s investment in Africa expanded as the bargain of new jobs and infrastructure in exchange for access to key minerals or food exports proved agreeable to many governments. Cross-border ties proliferated in the form of official security aid. While the deployment of foreign security teams was welcomed in some of the most dire failed states, one-size-fits-all solutions yielded few positive results. By 2025, people seemed to be growing weary of so much top-down control and letting leaders and authorities make choices for them. Wherever national interests clashed with individual interests, there was conflict. Sporadic pushback became increasingly organized and coordinated, as disaffected youth and people who had seen their status and opportunities slip away — largely in developing countries — incited civil unrest. In 2026, protestors in Nigeria brought down the government, fed up with the entrenched cronyism and corruption. Even those who liked the greater stability and predictability of this world began to grow uncomfortable and constrained by so many tight rules and by the strictness of national boundaries. The feeling lingered that sooner or later, something would inevitably upset the neat order that the world’s governments had worked so hard to establish.”
|
Preparing For Pandemic - President Trump’s September 19, 2019 Executive Order on “Modernizing Influenza Vaccines in the United States to Promote National Security and Public Health”, which very similarly asserts the essential need for a rapid rollout of vaccines in the event of a zoonotic viral pandemic; and
- Event 201, the much-noticed planning event coordinated by the Gates Foundation, the World Economic Forum and the Michael Bloomberg School of Public Health at Johns Hopkins University’s Center for Health Security, also gamed a global “novel zoonotic coronavirus” pandemic “modeled on SARS” killing 65 million people, issuing recommendations on how corporations could “help” in such a crisis. Although the gamed Event 201 pandemic was to occur in South America, one of the players in this event was from the Chinese Centers for Disease Control with no South American representatives in attendance.
- Microsoft founder Bill Gates’ statements and Gates Foundation activities throughout an extended period of time, including a 2013 Netflix documentary called “The Next Pandemic”. Is it not uncoincidental that Gates just “stepped down” from leadership of Microsoft to focus on his vaccine-focused “philanthropic initiatives”. Gates, together with help from Amazon, launched the Seattle Corona Assessment Network (SCAN), which is sending at-home corona tests to Seattle residents. SCAN is “an outgrowth of the Seattle Flu Study, which has been using genetic analysis to track the spread of infectious diseases for more than a year”, according to GeekWire. They are now “offering” nasal swabs to area residents, just as the Gates organization has taken human samples elsewhere in the world.
The origins of these developments in “syndromic surveillance” goes much further back, to the early post-911 days, which arguably ushered in Our ill-considered coup on Western democracy. Notably, the Rockefeller Lock Step scenario does not mention the word “vaccination”. It appears a strange omission, as anti-vaccine censorship and mandatory vaccine legislation also preceded this unprecedented alleged pandemic event. In fact, Rep. Adam Schiff of Russiagate fame has been recently sued by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons for “bullying tech companies into censoring information about vaccines.” Specifically, their complaint “points to letters Schiff sent to Google, Facebook, and Amazon in February and March of 2019 urging those companies to discredit or deplatform any content that suggests vaccines may be harmful.” Of course Amazon, Google and other Big Tech company have begun “disrupting healthcare” already. Now the people are being told vaccines will shortly provide them with the immunity they apparently lack. This is an even greater threat, as the Moderna vaccines that may be used, as reported by the great Mint Press News, now Unlimited Hangout reporter Whitney Webb, are DNA tamperers. We like to call them GMO vaccines. The ruling class attack is thus genetic and species-genocidal. Despite this omission, the Rockefeller “Lock Step” scenario is nonetheless a ruling class dream come true (but epically dire for the masses): the end of the sovereign individual in a cradle-to-grave system of behavioral, medical, digital surveillance and control. One wonders if the world’s leaders, celebrities and politicians who disproportionately seem to be afflicted with “novel corona” will be lining up for their biometric IDs. Also notable is the threat level attributed to encryption, which is blamed for the end of the global Internet and the free flow of information – and thus technological and economic innovation – among the world’s peoples. Consider this in the context of the EARN IT Act that has been heavily pushed by Attorney General Bill Barr, which calls for government backdoors ostensibly to fight online child abuse. These “steps” constitute an evisceration of constitutional democracy, the sovereignty of the individual and the advent of neofeudal conditions, where the corporate state is lord and master over one’s person. We call this “Chinafication.” Investigative journalist Harry Vox, who broke this document back in 2014, calls it “authoritarian capitalism”. Vox first warned the world about the Rockefeller pandemic “Lock Down” scenario on October 21, 2014 from New York City. His prescient and timely warning is highly suggested viewing.
|
|
@jond https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27266364/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1818087621000374https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32531395/ ( Recent progress of graphene oxide as a potential vaccine carrier and adjuvant) Efficient mRNA delivery with graphene oxide-polyethylenimine for generation of footprint-free human induced pluripotent stem cells. Here, we report an mRNA delivery system employing graphene oxide (GO)-polyethylenimine (PEI) complexes for the efficient generation of "footprint-free" iPSCs. GO-PEI complexes were found to be very effective for loading mRNA of reprogramming transcription factors and protection from mRNA degradation by RNase You don’t know anything, maybe you should listen more, and talk less. Graphene Oxide is an MRNA vaccine delivery molecule, used in all sorts of applications. |
@jond https://patents.google.com/patent/CN112220919A/en The invention belongs to the field of nano materials and biomedicine, and relates to a vaccine, in particular to development of 2019-nCoV coronavirus nuclear recombinant nano vaccine. The invention also comprises a preparation method of the vaccine and application of the vaccine in animal experiments. The new corona vaccine contains graphene oxide, carnosine, CpG and new corona virus RBD; binding carnosine, CpG and neocoronavirus RBD on the backbone of graphene oxide; the CpG coding sequence is shown as SEQ ID NO 1; the novel coronavirus RBD refers to a novel coronavirus protein receptor binding region which can generate a high-titer specific antibody aiming at the RBD in a mouse body, and provides a strong support for prevention and treatment of the novel coronavirus. Trade secrets are not declared on Ingredients lists. The lipid delivery mechanism falls under that category. There are medical studies after medical studies extolling the virtues of using Graphene Oxide and it being the best delivery mechanism for MRNA, independent scientists have looked at the vaccines and found Graphene oxide in them. Japan found suspended black particles in the vaccines that killed people, just suspended at the bottom of the vials. At least 30 researchers that have looked at this thing under the microscope, have seen all sorts of things not declared on the label. Trade secret........ also some of the biggest side effects of injected Graphene Oxide .......... Micro Clotting and Myocarditis. |
@jond The ingredients of the Covid vaccines have not been released, they are all still under EUA authorization. So reuters is lying....which is what reuters does very well.
All independent scientists that have looked at the vaccine are saying it contains massive amounts of graphene....Scientists working for major universities, world wide. |
@jond go to source, don't believe either. Show me the ingredients of the vaccine.
NIH, CDC,
whatever....Give me a list straight from the source. |
No one gets Beef for that Taco in a few years,
we have to save the planet, and as we all know...cow farts are melting the polar caps :)
Those farts
will kill
whatever grandmas covid leaves behind. |
|
|
The second they came out with the 8% Death rate, I knew ....
This was total crap.....
If you don’t even know how many people are infected, don’t even have a test for this "virus", how can you know the death rate? 2
weeks to slow the spread .....yeah
Planned shut down of the economy is very correct. |
|
Right now, the only thing I am concerned
with is protecting my civil rights against this Authoritarian technocracy, that is the only thing I am focused on.
Looking to move to a free state soon as
well.
This is not the time to be entertained, or to be distracted. |
|
@devilboy as God is my
witness....I have been saying since the start of this
whole thing, the real pandemic
will start "AFTER" the vaccinations. "Antibody Dependent Enhancement" ADE,
will the buzz
word of 2022.
Stay strong, you are not alone. Quite a many people see through this, and more are
waking up everyday.
|
If I’d have told you 5 years ago that the police will shut your businesses down, for 2 years straight, arrest people that go more than 5 kms from their place of residence, brutally arrest people less than a block outside of their homes because they are not wearing the proper face attire, cops would put people in a coma because they are having a conversation with their friends in public, stop people from crossing state lines to meet their family, outlaw travel completely, arrest people for organizing protests, arrest people for posting on social media.
If I was to tell you that countries would have heads of state that would be telling people that they would not be allowed to have any job, period....unless they took forced vaccinations.
You wouldn’t be able to enter stores, get on trains, planes, go to a grocery store, browsing in grocery stores would be made illegal, cops would arrest kids for being outside their homes, they would shoot peaceful protestors with rubber bullets to the face for just being outside.
You would have called me a raving lunatic, and would have told me to get myself checked into an insane asylum.
how far we have come. |
40% of wild deer have coronavirus antibodies: study https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2021/aug/4/40-wild-deer-have-coronavirus-antibodies-new-study/Everyone has already been exposed to this virus 2 years into the pandemic. The vaccine passports are about control, and are the beginning of a Chinese Social Credit system. It is not about someone’s grandma. And yes, if you speak out against the governments or corporations, they can just shut your bank account off...They have already done this with quite a many people on the right in America. Refuse vaccines.....No money in your account and no account. |
@sns the things you are asking the courts to decide have already been decided...
Forced vaccinations are a violation of the Nuremberg Code, Geneva Conventions and dozens of other International Human Rights treaties.
The US Supreme Court can eat a big fat DIK, doesn't matter
what they have to say... These are Natural Human Rights, Inalienable, endowed upon us by our Creator.
|
@sns might as well put a star on all the diseased people’s shoulders, and have them sit at home for the rest of eternity. Put them on a train to a safe place, where they can stay........ safe.
Courts went along with slavery, it was LEGAL, so was the internment of the Japanese.
And business’s are being forced to go along by the Federal Government.... IT IS A MANDATE.
Mask’s are a MANDATE. They are all enforced at the point of a gun. |
it’s not hyperbole.
we are left wondering how little people like you care that an entire segment of the population is being ostracized from daily life, their rights, jobs, everything is being taken away.
I used to think why other Germans did not say anything as the Jews were being loaded onto those trains, were being forced to wear those patches. How everyone stood around and labelled them as diseased....... I don’t have to guess anymore.
Can see it in action.
People clap and cheer for the Dystopia. |
I am not taking any vaccine, 40 plus % of this country is not taking the vaccine. Don’t care about the propaganda, the medical tyranny, the mandates, any of it.
I am not asking anyone to agree with the reasons as to why I or others are refusing to take it, but to agree that we have the right to refuse forced medical procedures.
If you keep pushing, like you are. This will end very badly for all parties involved....Civil wars have started for a lot less than this.
I just lost my Job because of this, and I am being forced to move from the state that I have called home for most of my life, I am being forced to leave behind a career I have dedicated most of my adult life to. Forced to do this.... as in I have no choice.
If you cant empathize with people in my predicament, you are the fascists history books are chocked full of. Empathy has to go both
ways........ |
To me it’s the same thing.
So stop supporting Forced vaccinations.
I find your support for such measures infinitely more disturbing.
They executed Nazi’s at the Hague for forced vaccinations of the jews.
Let that sink in... |
It is not a privilege to refuse forced vaccinations, it is a RIGHT. Any coercion, threats (such as loss of liberties, loss of job, curbs on travel, movement, etc) are violations of Human Rights. These "Rights" are enshrined in the Constitution on the United States of America....They do not come from the Government, but are inalienable God given Rights, they are Natural Rights...and cannot be taken away by a corporation, a mob, a Government, a Neighbor....or anyone else professing for the greater Good at the expense of the Individual. These Rights are non negotiable. |
The Nuremberg Code Makes 10 Declarations There are ten points to the code, which was published in the section of the verdict entitled “Permissible medical experiments”: 1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is a must. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision. This latter element requires that before the acceptance of an affirmative decision by the experimental subject there should be made known to him the nature, duration, and purpose of the experiment; the method and means by which it is to be conducted; all inconveniences and hazards reasonably to be expected; and the effects upon his health or person which may possibly come from his participation in the experiment. The duty and responsibility for ascertaining the quality of the consent rests upon each individual who initiates, directs, or engages in the experiment. It is a personal duty and responsibility which may not be delegated to another with impunity. 2. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and unnecessary in nature. 3. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. 4. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
5. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects. 6. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment. 7. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury, disability, or death. 8. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
9. During the course of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
10. During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject.
|
And I agree, this
whole thing started under Trump. They are 2 sides of the same coin...
No politician is coming to save us, both sides are controlled opposition.
However, ALL the public support for these mandates and restrictions is coming from the Corporate Liberal side of the spectrum.
|
That’s the problem, these latte sipping corporatists that think this stuff is a joke..... They don’t realize how many sacrifices people have had to make to win these freedoms back from all the Tyrants of Human History.
They’ll trade in everything sacred for a new IPhone, glued to their TV’s.. picturing themselves as rebels, regurgitating Corporate media talking points ad nauseum.
we are definitely in trouble, but more and more are waking up everyday.
|
You
would have to be blind to not see
what is happening all around the
world, some
will stay stubborn to the very end, the cognitive dissonance is sadly that deep.
But yeah,
we all feel that something is very
wrong
with this "pandemic" even if most can't explain
why.
The media is going to ratchet up the fear even more, they are still in the advertising part of the vaccine mandate......the scapegoat part of it is coming next.
And the scared herd
will be used as a bludgeon against the ones that are still resisting.
Divide and Conquer 101
The only question I have is, if they will be able to blame the failure of the vaccines on the ones that didn't take it? They are trying to sell that story, it's gonna be a hard push.
But then again, their audience is extremely gullible if nothing else.
|
This is not ignorance..... They believe this in their heart of hearts.
They really really believe it. Yes, the TV is shaping their Worldview, I would not argue that... but they have bought this way of thinking hook line and sinker.
Taking a living away from a man is akin to killing him, and they make these proclamations so callously.
One of my friends, has a 1.5 year old daughter, has a wife 7 months pregnant, he recently got fired from his job at his accounting firm. Do what we tell you, or you and your family starve to death. ( He will land on his feet/ how many others won’t ?)
They really believe this...... what else will they not be willing to do, if the TV tells them it is okay?
|
@jond Rape by needle? Nah, I'll pass. |
|
|
"Which leaves you folks with individual choice to not take vaccine. No one is denying you this choice, you only have to pay the cost of losing some level of privilege."
They are not "Privileges" They are basic Human Rights.
You people are monsters.
Like Seriously... |
