Hi Kublakhan,
As the guy that designed the Counterpoint SA-5.1 and who is presently offering the upgrades for it, I just want to add a couple of comments. The realities of manufacturing for the retail market make it really hard to offer as good a value to the customer as we'd like. Retailers get about 50% of the customer's money; and on a new product, over 2/3rds of the cost of parts goes to parts not in the signal path, like the chassis and knobs and front panel (this last must be expensive because hi-fi gear is often judged by how it looks). Shipping cartons, medical insurance for employees, really expensive shows and even more expensive magazine advertising . . . all these force a designer to spend far less on the signal path than he might like. I know that I always struggled with that at Counterpoint if Marketing were to request a $3,500 preamp (say), which I knew gave me a budget of about $240 for the electronic parts.
Which is what all other manufacturers have to deal with -- Counterpoint was not unique. (I go into this in a bit more detail at http://www.altavistaaudio.com/why_upgrade.html).
When comparing a $3,500 new preamp against spending $3,500 on an older preamp + it's upgrades, I personally think you're spending the money more where it counts: on the electronics in the signal path. You're not buying new chassis or "cosmetics," you're not paying a retail markup, you're not paying a guy (me) who is spending beaucoup bucks on advertising and shows and trips around the world to service overseas markets. While every dollar that you spend retail nets you about seven cents of electronic parts, a dollar spent on my upgrades nets about ten times that in parts. And the parts I use are amazingly better-sounding than the parts Counterpoint (or ARC/cj/VAC, et al) could ever use simply because they are so expensive. And they sound like it -- they sound lovely.
I guess one final comment I'd like to make -- and thanks Frogman for offering your experience -- is that while Frogman is comparing a factory stock, manufactured in the 1980's preamp to other preamps, the upgraded SA-5.1 has handily trounced preamps costing upwards of $12,000 in dealer showroom and customer listening tests. It's just a really cost-effective way to get phenomenal sound IMHO.
Michael Elliott
As the guy that designed the Counterpoint SA-5.1 and who is presently offering the upgrades for it, I just want to add a couple of comments. The realities of manufacturing for the retail market make it really hard to offer as good a value to the customer as we'd like. Retailers get about 50% of the customer's money; and on a new product, over 2/3rds of the cost of parts goes to parts not in the signal path, like the chassis and knobs and front panel (this last must be expensive because hi-fi gear is often judged by how it looks). Shipping cartons, medical insurance for employees, really expensive shows and even more expensive magazine advertising . . . all these force a designer to spend far less on the signal path than he might like. I know that I always struggled with that at Counterpoint if Marketing were to request a $3,500 preamp (say), which I knew gave me a budget of about $240 for the electronic parts.
Which is what all other manufacturers have to deal with -- Counterpoint was not unique. (I go into this in a bit more detail at http://www.altavistaaudio.com/why_upgrade.html).
When comparing a $3,500 new preamp against spending $3,500 on an older preamp + it's upgrades, I personally think you're spending the money more where it counts: on the electronics in the signal path. You're not buying new chassis or "cosmetics," you're not paying a retail markup, you're not paying a guy (me) who is spending beaucoup bucks on advertising and shows and trips around the world to service overseas markets. While every dollar that you spend retail nets you about seven cents of electronic parts, a dollar spent on my upgrades nets about ten times that in parts. And the parts I use are amazingly better-sounding than the parts Counterpoint (or ARC/cj/VAC, et al) could ever use simply because they are so expensive. And they sound like it -- they sound lovely.
I guess one final comment I'd like to make -- and thanks Frogman for offering your experience -- is that while Frogman is comparing a factory stock, manufactured in the 1980's preamp to other preamps, the upgraded SA-5.1 has handily trounced preamps costing upwards of $12,000 in dealer showroom and customer listening tests. It's just a really cost-effective way to get phenomenal sound IMHO.
Michael Elliott