Continuation of my Thread on VPI, Basis, Origin...


....Graham etc.
First off thanks all for your help and advice.

So here is where I stand. I believe that I have a good unit...Aries/10.5/helikon/Benz M2 BUT my integration was not thought out well. Possibly better match with cartridges and arm. I also believe that the weakest point in my set up is the 10/5 arm. So I am leaning to an upgrade to the arm. I hope I can keep my cartridges...I like to use both (one or two months at a time). My candidates are Graham 2.2, Origin Live (high end version) and then possible the Vector.
Now the question. If I got this route, so I change the table? Will a Basis 2500 make a difference, a Big difference?? My advice in another thread says yes.

Finally, this afternoon I was listening to the EMI recording of Rachmaninov "The Bells" and toward the end of side one, close to the spindle, I began to hear low level rumble for about 3-4 revolutions. Is this the result of poor anti-skate, turntable feedback, poor isolation (I have a pretty good table for the set-up) poor recording??? I tried this section of the record on BOTH cartridges and same results.

Comments please....again, Thanks
rwd

Showing 1 response by brulee

Hi ya Been Rwd? I think I gave some input on a thread with a similar question you ask now. Not sure. I will pass along what myself and friend Jcbtubes felt about these TTs. The VPI with your arm, the top of the line Audio Research Phono Stage, The pre amp i do not remember. I am sure Jcbtubes will remember should he post. I think the cartridge was a Benz, not sure of the spelling. The VPI that we listened to was the latest, greatest, TNT at the time. This took place about a year ago. Very nice sounding setup.

We then listened to the Basis 2500, Graham arm, and i think a VDH cartridge. The phono section we listened to did not have near the reputation of the ARC phono section. The preamp used was made by Jcbtubes. As nice as the TNT sounded, it could not come close to what we heard from the 2500. We tried to be as polite as possible. Very hard when it was so obvious that the TNT was no contest for the Basis 2500. I realize there could be many reasons why the TNT failed to compete with the 2500. I would love to give a good reason. We did not do this comparison in a manner which would benefit the Basis. In fact, The TNT had a dedicated stand, some kind of device that makes sure the motor is always running at the proper speed. But the TNT sounded slow, rounded, too rounded, not even close in bass performance, with a soundstage that sounded a bit closed in in comparison to the basis. Again, there could have been a problem that we could not figure out with the TNT. I will end this story saying that Jcbtubes bought the 2500. After what was heard, he would have been foolish not to.
This is no attempt to put down the TNT. It has such a great reputation, I would never be so foolish to degrade this TT with such a great standing among many audiophiles.