"George (Ajazi): what were the differences you noted between these two speakers? Was it the presentation and soundstage, or differences in resolution?"
I thought the Coincidents were more transparent and resolving than the Ty's. I thought that the Ty's were a little too flat for my tastes.
Again, this is all personal preference and I use a tube preamp and tube mono's. So the sound I'm going for and hearing could be much different than what you'd hear.
I'm also only using CD's as source material, no vinyl.
My good friend now owns the Ty's (I sold them to him) and he loves them. He uses them with solid state amplification and in a basement without carpeting on the floor and/or drywall on the walls and he uses vinyl almost exclusively. He feels that they are not "loud" enough. He can clip his amps without a problem.
The Coincidents with tubes are amazing.
Also, even though there are no people listed on Ty's site as being in your area, I guarantee you if you post a new thread on this forum for Ty speaker owners in your area, you'd more than likely get a bite.
Best of luck.
-George
I thought the Coincidents were more transparent and resolving than the Ty's. I thought that the Ty's were a little too flat for my tastes.
Again, this is all personal preference and I use a tube preamp and tube mono's. So the sound I'm going for and hearing could be much different than what you'd hear.
I'm also only using CD's as source material, no vinyl.
My good friend now owns the Ty's (I sold them to him) and he loves them. He uses them with solid state amplification and in a basement without carpeting on the floor and/or drywall on the walls and he uses vinyl almost exclusively. He feels that they are not "loud" enough. He can clip his amps without a problem.
The Coincidents with tubes are amazing.
Also, even though there are no people listed on Ty's site as being in your area, I guarantee you if you post a new thread on this forum for Ty speaker owners in your area, you'd more than likely get a bite.
Best of luck.
-George