2. amps-preamps
  3. 1307483980

Coincident Frankenstein SET and Avantgarde

I would love to hear opinions of members who actually used, or at least heard this particular combo.
My speakers are Avantgarde Duo Omega G2
Room is Rives designed 21x16x8 ft.
Its absolutely imperative for the amplifier to be dynamic in addition to all usual "audiophile" qualities.
I initially planned to go with SET amplifier by another company, but for reasons beyond my control, it's on indefinite hold for now.
If someone could also compare Franks with Lamm ML 2, Art Aodio PX 25, and other SETs, it'll be an added bonus for me
maril555

Showing 2 responses by brf

brf
1,715 posts
 
I have some experience with both the Coincident Frankenstein Mk1 and the Lamm 2.1. I did not like the Frankenstein. The build construction was poor and the transformers had a buzzing sound. The Franks were connected to Acapella horn speakers and you could hear the tube rush through the horns. Admittedly, these were Mk1 Franks and the newer Coincident Frankenstein’s maybe be better built and have a lower sound floor, but I cannot confirm this statement.

The Lamms, were in an entirely different league. Dead quite, well built, and had a very low sound floor. For an 18w amplifier, they sounded very dynamic and detailed. The only thing that I did not like about the Lamms was the price. If you can swing the price of the Lamm, I think it would be a no brainer. Enjoy!
brf
1,715 posts
 
Charles1dad, I have also heard the original Coincident Dragons and their build construction was also very poor. One of my friend's Dragons had a slightly twisted top plate because it could not properly support the amp’s weight. He subsequently upgraded to the Dragon Mk2 and I must say, build quality is much better, therefore, I can only assume the same holds true for the Mk2 Franks. BTW, I have the same speakers as you except in natural cherry.
More to discover