Cytocycle:
Thank you. I did not list my components precisely because my question pertains only to the Rowland -- whether my Rowland preamp sounds better if my ARC CD3 cd player is connected to it through the ARC's RCA outs or XLR outs (probably not, as the ARC is not truly balanced, I don't believe) is in fact a question about the ARC, not the Rowland. But truly balanced preamps, I presume, require a truly balanced input signal to output a truly balanced signal, correct, and thus cannot be considered in a vacuum? Please excuse my electro-mechanical ignorence.
Let me re-phrase my initial question: assuming (i) that the Rowland can be fed either a truly balanced signal or single-ended signal from the same source component, and that the source component sounds basically the same whether run single-ended or balanced, (ii) that the Rowland is feeding an amp that is truly balanced but can be run single-ended, and the amp has both single-ended and balanced inputs, and the amp sounds basically the same whether run balanced or single-ended, and (iii) the components are connected first in one mode and then in another via interconnects that are offered in both balanced and single-ended form and sound basically the same in either configuration, any difference in the Rowland's sound run balanced or single-ended? I know these components do not function in a vacuum and that the Rowland's sound, and thus the overall sound, will differ if the source component feeding it sounds better run either balanced or single-ended (and, depending upon whether a given interconnect sounds better in its single-ended or balanced version, if it is manufactured both ways). I also understand that a balanced signal tends to be twice the voltage of a single-ended signal. But assuming a truly balanced source component that sounds basically the same whether run single-ended or balanced, and assuming a balanced amp that sounds basically the same whether run single-ended or balanced, i.e., all variables are eliminated, the question is whether the Rowland, if fed a balanced and unbalanced signal of basically equal quality, would sound better one way or the other. Perhaps my question is stupid because the designer would not have chosen balanced unless balanced sounds better, and there are not RCA inputs or outputs on the Coherence II, necessitating the use of convertors (I use the presumably a bit better Cardas-modified rhodium-plated Neutrix convertors over the stock Neutrix convertors), but the pre is said by the owner's manual to operate equally well when run single-ended. So again, the question becomes, if fed a signal that sounds the same whether in truly balanced or single-ended form, and assuming that signal is passed on by the Coherence II to a balanced amp that sounds the same whether run balanced or single-ended, what result?
Thanks!
Thank you. I did not list my components precisely because my question pertains only to the Rowland -- whether my Rowland preamp sounds better if my ARC CD3 cd player is connected to it through the ARC's RCA outs or XLR outs (probably not, as the ARC is not truly balanced, I don't believe) is in fact a question about the ARC, not the Rowland. But truly balanced preamps, I presume, require a truly balanced input signal to output a truly balanced signal, correct, and thus cannot be considered in a vacuum? Please excuse my electro-mechanical ignorence.
Let me re-phrase my initial question: assuming (i) that the Rowland can be fed either a truly balanced signal or single-ended signal from the same source component, and that the source component sounds basically the same whether run single-ended or balanced, (ii) that the Rowland is feeding an amp that is truly balanced but can be run single-ended, and the amp has both single-ended and balanced inputs, and the amp sounds basically the same whether run balanced or single-ended, and (iii) the components are connected first in one mode and then in another via interconnects that are offered in both balanced and single-ended form and sound basically the same in either configuration, any difference in the Rowland's sound run balanced or single-ended? I know these components do not function in a vacuum and that the Rowland's sound, and thus the overall sound, will differ if the source component feeding it sounds better run either balanced or single-ended (and, depending upon whether a given interconnect sounds better in its single-ended or balanced version, if it is manufactured both ways). I also understand that a balanced signal tends to be twice the voltage of a single-ended signal. But assuming a truly balanced source component that sounds basically the same whether run single-ended or balanced, and assuming a balanced amp that sounds basically the same whether run single-ended or balanced, i.e., all variables are eliminated, the question is whether the Rowland, if fed a balanced and unbalanced signal of basically equal quality, would sound better one way or the other. Perhaps my question is stupid because the designer would not have chosen balanced unless balanced sounds better, and there are not RCA inputs or outputs on the Coherence II, necessitating the use of convertors (I use the presumably a bit better Cardas-modified rhodium-plated Neutrix convertors over the stock Neutrix convertors), but the pre is said by the owner's manual to operate equally well when run single-ended. So again, the question becomes, if fed a signal that sounds the same whether in truly balanced or single-ended form, and assuming that signal is passed on by the Coherence II to a balanced amp that sounds the same whether run balanced or single-ended, what result?
Thanks!