CJ Premier 11a vs. Audio Research VT50/VT100MKII ?


I'm currently running a CJ Premier 11a driving a pair of Thiel CS 1.5's. The CJ has 4 6550 output tubes. My preamp is the Audio Research LS16. My main source component is the Cary 306/200 24/192 CD player. This combo sounds very nice to me.

I would be curious to know if anyone has personal experience with the CJ Premier 11a vs the AR VT-50 which would be the most fair comparison since the VT-50 also uses 4 6550 output tubes and is in the same price range (LIST).

I'm also seeking opinions on the CJ Premier 11a vs the AR VT100MKII (and the VT50 vs VT100MKII for that matter) which is more expensive and uses 8 6550 output tubes vs the CJ's 4. Opinions based on personal experience only please, not something you've read in an audiophile rag or online review. Thanks!
abecollins

Showing 1 response by etbaby

Hi,
I have a setup similar to yours. I have been using the ARC LS16 and LS12 with my CJ 11a. First some general comments.

1. The set up is very very correct sonically. If you are trying to create music you should not change amplifiers!

2. You can make substantial imporvements by using ARC tube dampers on the input and driver tubes to the CJ 11a. This will improve resolution and dynamics.

3. Right out of the box the CJ 11a is missing bass response. Upgrade your output tubes to KT88s. This will improve the low end response and increase your amplifiers output power from 70 watts to about 84 watts. Use the Svetlana or Telsa KT88s.

4. The LS 16 is not a full frequency preamp. That is the bass response is down somewhat. The attraction of this pre is its glorious midrange with delicate highs. By the way the LS12 is actually a better preamp and will work with your CJ 11a quite nicely.

5. Make these changes and you can forget about the VT100 MkII. I have not heard the MkIII.