Cjlcapp, you have clearly touched a nerve! I have wrestled with the ideas at the core of your question for some time. The answer for you will be of course be your own, but it's encouraging to see such differing points offered for consideration. In fact, the emotion displayed in this thread shows that we take this seriously.
On that thought, I offer my own view. Lush, I agree with you. Krelldog, I disagree but I see where you are coming from.
The litmus test for me is found through intention. If your intention is to buy from a brick and mortar, then taking their resources is potentially an equitable transaction. If, however, your intention is to take their resources without buying, you have in fact stolen.
This is obviously a moral thing, and I don't pretend to take the high road easily. Anyone else have the same view?
On that thought, I offer my own view. Lush, I agree with you. Krelldog, I disagree but I see where you are coming from.
The litmus test for me is found through intention. If your intention is to buy from a brick and mortar, then taking their resources is potentially an equitable transaction. If, however, your intention is to take their resources without buying, you have in fact stolen.
This is obviously a moral thing, and I don't pretend to take the high road easily. Anyone else have the same view?