Cerious cables - Proper setup and run in time


Results on testing Cables especially Cerious cables
These cables need at least 4 days to settle in, if you take them out of the system, (The process starts over again.)That is the only proper way to do this , because of the liquid ceramic , that is the only way to fairly judge them point 2. if your loudspeakers are over 90 db effficient Bob needs to know at Cerious , also if you are in a high Magnetic area such as airports. Bob would rather not have to sheild them if possible. High efficiency
loudspeakers will bring out hum for sure in a non sheilded cable ,that is why results showed this on a 101db loudspeakers at Srajans .Try the test under these guide lines I have laid down, after 4 days you will see a totally more positive result, a very natural not pushed presentation. Please remember , and try this,
many times people get used to artificial enhancments
Like a Valhala cable for example excellent in some areas and applications,way to clinical in other systems dependand as in most all cables,
and preference .Go to a symphony and listen,
things in life are ususally smoother than you experience on a playback system ,especially cd , ananlog is allways smoother .I have been a audio engineer for over 30 years and have voiced several electrostatic loudspeakers .
Where in the midrange they are natural, and magical.
The big debate on reference cables, compared to in life , or not, also Bob at Cerious needs to ask how efficient
the speakers are,impedances, and the environment and surroundings to
give sheilded cables if needed .This will become standard procedure soon. Happy listening, PJ.
aaudiophile

Showing 8 responses by stanhifi

Not a problem TBG and I think the God thing is a slight exaggeration. Anyway, if you need anymore assistance, I'd be glad to oblige. Good luck and good listening to you!!
These are highly capacitive cables. The owner will say this begrudgingly if pushed hard enough but will dismiss the impact on the cable's performance. The high end is not natural, never will be, and in a highly resolving system is very evident. Good luck.
Perhaps they were better than his existing cables which I suppose doesn't say much for whatever he was using prior to the CT. You must realize also that Edgar has not published many cable reviews. Let's not forget Srajan sent his back (as I did) in favor of cables costing almost 50% less. Is it difficult for you as an owner to realize that this product is simply another interconnect and maybe overpriced at that? Thank you for your comments though.
Just another gimmick. They are not worth your listening time. Cables costing half as much (Zu Varial) smoke them. Check out 6moons.
Good will and peace towards men. How about joining me my skeptical friend???
:-)
You say that you've reviewed more cables than many long term reviewers. OK fine, but 5 published reviews is hardly what I would call "many" (my words). Furthermore the cables you've reviewed are mid-fi, low budget products not high end reference level products such as Indra, Dominus, MIT, Prana, Kubala, etc.
Now regarding all of the cables you've claimed to have owned and auditioned, we all know talk is cheap. Let's see the list your published listening notes along with the associated equipment. You magazine guys are hilarious.
Why would anybody buy the speakers after hearing the cables? Must be a masochistic audiophile.
Ouch!!
Why do I post? Readers need to know the absolute truth about this product and the owners are unwilling to give it up. Thanks for asking and good listening to you.