uber, I may have missed this but I’ll ask.
When you conducted Al’s test and didn’t hear noise while tapping on the tubes, were your cones still in the downward position? If so and the cones are more effective that way, possibly that masked a bad tube? I’d reverse the cones and try the tapping test again. If any one tube is noisier than the others then replace it. If the difference in one or more tubes is marginal that may be obscured by vibrations.
Then with the replaced tube(s) if you turn the cones downward again you may have even less background interference and increased detail, resolution, etc.
I’m not certain of this but should be worth a try.
When you conducted Al’s test and didn’t hear noise while tapping on the tubes, were your cones still in the downward position? If so and the cones are more effective that way, possibly that masked a bad tube? I’d reverse the cones and try the tapping test again. If any one tube is noisier than the others then replace it. If the difference in one or more tubes is marginal that may be obscured by vibrations.
Then with the replaced tube(s) if you turn the cones downward again you may have even less background interference and increased detail, resolution, etc.
I’m not certain of this but should be worth a try.