Cartridge suggestions


Hi. Helping a friend find a new cartridge for his Pro-ject TT. He has a 2Experience with 9" EVO carbon arm. Listens to mostly jazz/acoustic music. Phono stage is an EAR834P clone. Speakers are Spendor BC1's. Ideally a neutral and articulate cartridge as if anything too laid back might end up making the whole system a bit too mushy. As the phono stage only has MM capabilities, LO MC cartridge isn't an option. So, HO MC, or MM/MI options please. Looking to keep this under 500 and used isn't really an option. Thanks!
perkri

Showing 5 responses by elliottbnewcombjr

Practicability considerations:

Signal Strength, related amplification factors

I also use only MM; higher output a choice factor, I prefer at least 3.5mV.
...................................   

Calibration Skills (and related tools)

Skills and tools for many alignments/calibrations are VERY important for ANY TT, ANY Arm, ANY Cartridge. Expensive or Basic. A bargain setup can beat a very costly system depending on calibrations.  LP can beat CD, beat streaming, ... ONLY if properly setup!

Owner skills, or access to a professional for proper setup is important.
..............................

Stylus Shape, Cantilever Material, Replacement

Think stylus shape, cantilever material, and cost/availability of replacement stylus now when choosing a cartridge.

highly respected source of replacement stylus

https://www.jico-stylus.com/

I prefer either Shibata or SAS stylus shape. I avoid the most brittle cantilever, thus I bought a replacement stylus: SAS stylus tip with Boron cantilever from Jico.

https://www.jico-stylus.com/product/vn5xmr-hg-sas-b/
............................

Cleaning Skills

Using advanced stylus shapes with more contact surface in the grooves makes cleaning even more important. Clean Stylus is important. People who experience lots of disruptive static most often lack the proper cleaning skills. I recently improved my cleaning skills, and am enjoying my used LPs with SAS tip essentially static free.

.......................

Elliptical Stylus is Less Costly

Example: Shure m97xe. now discontinued (Shure stopped making cartridges). I used this quite happily for years. Jico makes a replacement stylus for it:

https://www.jico-stylus.com/product/n97xe-sas-b/comment-page-6/

Find one? Find a body and put a new Jico SAS stylus in it? (body you can return).
.......................

Brushes

I like Shure brushes (and the sound of their cartridges).

Damped to steady LP irregularities, anti-static, and gathers small particles before the stylus gets to the grooves. Other brush arrangements exist.

Shure (others) with integral brushes can be used with the brush down in use, or pivoted up off the LP, Shure factory damped brushes, when down in use 'push up' 0.5g; so i.e. for 1.25g tracking force, using brush, set at 1.75 tracking, and anti-skate to match the 'effective 1.25 TF.

If set, and changing to brush up out of use, re calibrate TF to 1.25, double check anti-skate which was set for 1.25 already.

Jico wrote me that their replacement brushes are NOT damped, just a brush, so the upward force is different, a bit of guess work involved. 
.............................

Protection of Stylus 

Check out the method/ease of stylus protection during detailed arm/cartridge/stylus calibrations.

Shure flip up/down brushes, Jico replacement stylus with flip up/down brush, and Audio Technica slip on protective cover are all easy.

My Grado Mono cartridge (love it's sound): it's small snap on plastic cover is ok for shipping, but lousy for protection when calibrating.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

USED

I would consider buying a used cartridge body, from a highly regarded source, only if returns accepted. 

I would plan on the cost of a replacement stylus in cost calculations.

Used Stylus, separate or comes in used cartridge body you want: that's risky, might get lucky, but 
I also like the Audio Technica ML Microline Cartridges, I have the AT440ml (earlier version)

this I consider a great find, NEW, BUY IT NOW, $192. delivered

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Audio-Technica-AT440MLb-Cartridge/202816707471?hash=item2f38d15b8f:g:VkgAAOSwtsBdw2Ui

no returns, but, says unopened, and protected by paypal/ebay, and, use your best credit card with protection.

'Quadrophonic' in description. Don't be confused, these are terrific for stereo. The advanced stylus, deeper in the groove, were needed for the short quad lp era. Actually, we have quad to thank for these advanced stylus shapes.
cleeds2,765 posts03-07-2020 12:07pm
"It sounds like you’re playing dirty records
I wouldn’t use a phono cartridge that relied on a brush.
 but if I did, I’d measure its effect with a proper VTF scale."

How do you clean your LP's? How do you clean your Stylus?

Look into a sunbeam, as many dust particles as there are stars. Perfectly clean new or used LP, dust lands during play.

BENEFITS, not relies on the brush. The advance team, like a curling broom

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curling#Curling_broom

It can be left up as I mentioned.

Guesswork with Jico Brush? I get it right, however Shure gives guidance/specifics, based on their expertise, Jico does not.

I do measure TF with a digital scale, with brush up and brush down, however, during play, what dynamics involved?

I set TF and anti-skate with test records, lp with no grooves, ear, specific 3 channel sources, I get it right.

I've been using Shure cartridges with brushes since 1970, and was darn happy to find that Jico makes replacement stylus with their version of a brush.

The Stanton Chackster mentioned, and other Stantons, Pickerings, .... have brushes, can be down in use, or up as desired.