Cartridge, Compliance, try what in my JVC UA-7082 Arm?


So, what to try in my new JVC UA-7082 Tonearm when it comes? (effective length 282mm) (11-1/8")

Guidelines? Advice? (I never bothered learning about compliance, I guess now's the time).

Anyone know the Mass of the UA-7082 Tonearm without a cartridge _______?
.....................................

Self Imposed Restrictions:

High Output, 4.0mV or more (to avoid tube preamp hum zone until it's repaired).

MM Only. (I am fundamentally opposed to MC pre-pre amp, as well as needing high output).


.......................................

Motley Crew On Hand:

4 headshells, none special

Shure MicroRidge Stylus and V15VxMR Cartridge

Shure V15VMR Cartridge (no stylus, I gave it a dirty look and it broke, horribly brittle shaft)

Shure 97xe Elliptical Stylus and Cartridge (despite it's low pedigree it's my current favorite).

Shure N78S Stylus (fits 97xe) (I did not inherit the 78's someone threatened me with).

Shure M44E Stylus and Cartridge

Audio Technica MicroLine AT440ML OOC Stylus and Cartridge

Audio Technica AT7000 body, no stylus

Audio Technica ATP-2

Audio Technica Series VIII P mount 

Audio Technica ___? Came with the AT120 TT (tracks 2.5g, I never used it) 

................................
It's a busy time, it doesn't get here till mid Jan, so theirs time to research.

Thanks in advance, Elliott






elliottbnewcombjr

Showing 21 responses by elliottbnewcombjr

I bought this one,

It has original Headshell and Cartridge: Victor Z1s, not sure what Stylus is in it.

Victor cartridges say 2/4 channel, what's that about?
Z1s would indicate 'spherical'

found this who found that

" In searching for an answer to the above, I came across the following post on Audio Circle forum by a member whose screen name is griffithds:

All Z-1 bodies are the same. There is a Z-1, Z-1S, Z-1E, Z-1EB, Z-4 which is also a Z-1 and a few others.

All the same. All the stylus are interchangeable. But they are not interchangeable with the X-1.

The cartridge generators are very similar but they (Victor/JVC), changed the diameter of the tube that slides into the cartridge body so the X-1 and Z-1 are NOT interchangeable.

But they do sound the same. I own both and have to get up and go over to the turntable to be able to make a correct determination as to which one is mounted and playing.

That is unless you have the SAS stylus attached. No mistaking it when it is mounted. Also, when you order the SAS from Jico you can get the clear housing, the green housing or the orange housing. These are the different colors of the -1 (clear), the -1E (orange),or the -1EB (green), stylus housings. Exact same SAS stylus but just in case you want to stay with the same color of the 'Z' cartridge that you own, Jico supplies you with the option to buy the same color of stylus housing. The 'clear' housing is the color of the one that came with the Z-1.

Just for information purposes, the Z-1 was a Beryllium cantilever with a Shibata tip. The 'E' versions were Elliptical tip. The 'S' version is conical or spherical. The 'B' on the 'EB' version was E for Elliptical, B for Beryllium.

Hope this answers your questions. If not, then ask again because someone could write a book on all the variations of this Jem!"
So, we find a stiff Mono cartridge IF I buy a Victor 7045 arm,

or, I get a different arm designed for/will work with high output MM Mono cartridge.
Well,

I have tricky ways to avoid pushing the preamp volume up to hum zone. With current 4.0mV output, the hum starts just above my preferred maximum, that is why I am looking for high output, equal to 4.0mV.

alt. use 1. Current. 

TT  to McIntosh tube tuner/preamp mx110z (thru preamp for it's wonderful Phono EQ), Then preamp to Cayin A88T tube amp, via Cayin's 'preamp in", (just a thruput). Volume is from McIntosh preamp.  Volume limited by hum.

alt use 2.

TT to preamp for it's Phono EQ. Importantly, it has 2 MM phono inputs. I will use 1 for 12" stereo arm, other for 9" mono arm.

Then, the difference, plug the preamp into any Cayin amp line in, get volume from Cayin amp, no nooise of any kind.

alt use 3.

Now possible, using current TT (won't be option for TT81/7082/7045).

This would work until I have the preamp overhauled.

Audio-Technica has built-in phono preamp. I use it, go straight to Tube Amp, skip going thru McIntosh preamp.

In spring get preamp overhauled by McIntosh, solving hum.

................................

As I say, with 97xe 4.0mV, the hum starts just above. If I get lower output, then we get into hum territory.


Merry Christmas/Happy Holidays

Mono Cartridge for UA-7045 arm.
..........................

Grado ________ ME+. wgt. 5.5g; track 1.5g; output 5mV.

COMPLIANCE ______?    (exact or range, low, mid, high?) 

I just wrote Grado and asked what the compliance is, and if they think it is ok for JVC UA-7045 arm.

.................................

Ortofon 2 Mono, basic $360; 2M Mono SE version $530.

nude shibata r/R6/50um; weighs 7.2g; track 1.5g; output 3.5mV
compliance: dynamic, lateral, 22um/mN
........................

??????????????
uberwaltz,

thanks, I looked it up,

Denon DL-102 Technical Data
  • Output: 3.0mV
  • Output impedance: 240ohms
  • Stylus: 17.0 micron round tip
  • Frequency range: 50Hz-10kHz
  • Tracking force: 2.0-4.0g
  • Weight: 13.0g

Ideally, I hope to track with elliptical, Shibata, SAS tip, lighter force than that, and get more bass without trouble.

And, not pay a lot for it.

Anyone remember the Meineke Muffler commercial:

 https://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1SQJL_enUS881US881&sxsrf=ACYBGNRYFlACzZMRq37-PE_ARucH0DfkNw%3A1577366352809&ei=ULMEXrX8MM_OtAbM-pxQ&q=not+gonna+pay+alot+for+this+muffler&oq=not+gonna+pay&gs_l=psy-ab.1.0.0i22i30j0i22i10i30l4j0i22i30l4j0i22i10i30.21667.25729..29281...0.1..0.103.1099.11j2....2..0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71j35i39j0i273j0i131j0i67j0.3hrQSztLpQw

Being careful, before choosing the rear arm for Mono,

I will wait to see the exact location of the existing rear hole on the dual arm tt I bought.

We don't know what arm it was drilled for.

UA-7045 is effective 9-5/8" 

I am warming up to the Grado ME+ Mono Cartridge, waiting for Grado to tell me the compliance. It's elliptical, not Shibata like the Ortofon, but the Grado internals sound advantageous, and help suppress Resonance.


I may try a Shibata or SAS stylus in the JVC Z1 cartridge that is coming with the TT.

Meanwhile, I am reading that using Shure's Dynamic Stabilizer Brush allows using higher compliance cartridges in some higher mass situations, like the JVC-UA-7082 and 7045 arms. 

I can easily try both my Shure V15Vmr and 97xe, both use the brush.

Shure only gives Static Compliance Specs.

Shure makes a correlation of compliance with designed tracking force, i.e. suspension must be stiffer, less compliant, for higher tracking force. I always set both my Shures at 1.25g successfully using Thorens Td124 with SME 3009, Audio-Technica AT120 with it's similar weight arm. 

.................

from Shure,  June 19, 2015

Static Compliance Specifications and Definition,

The static compliance specifications for Shure phono cartridges are:

V15 Type I - 0.000025 cm per dyne of force
V15 Type II - 0.000025 cm per dyne of force

V15 Type III - 0.000030 cm per dyne of force

V15 Type IV - 0.000025 cm per dyne of force

V15 Type V (all versions) - 0.000025 cm per dyne of force

All cartridges that track from 0.75 to 1.5 grams - 0.000025 cm per dyne of force

All cartridges that track from 1.5 to 3.0 grams - 0.000020 cm per dyne of force

All cartridges that track from 2.0 to 4.0 grams - 0.000015 cm per dyne of force

All cartridges that track from 3.0 to 5.0 grams - 0.000010 cm per dyne of force

Note: Static compliance is an indicator of low frequency tracking only.

High frequency tracking is dependent upon stylus mass and stylus stiffness. High frequency tracking is specified (when available) by trackability specifications.

In basic terms, compliance is the opposite for stiffness. High stiffness = low compliance. Low stiffness = high compliance. The static compliance of a phono stylus is determined by the stiffness of the elastic bushing that supports the stylus shank.

Look above at the V15 Type I. Apply one dyne of force (by pushing sideways) on the stylus tip and the tip moves 0.000025 cm away from its resting spot. A stylus that requires a greater tracking force is less compliant because the stylus shank is more robust, and the heavier shank requires a stiffer elastic bushing for support.

Analogy: A plastic straw can be supported by a soft elastic bushing. That same bushing would collapse if the straw were made of iron." 



grado service reply to me about their Mono Cartridge

"Yes, the ME+ is compatible" (I asked about UA-7045 tonearm)

they did not give any specific compliance info.

 
Semi-Final Decisions, thanks so much for all the help so far,

Dual Arm Deck Purchased:

https://www.canuckaudiomart.com/details/649553719-victor-jvc-tt-81-direct-drive-quartz-lock-turntable-with-long-victor-ua-7082-tonearm/?utm_campaign=response-received&utm_source=notification&utm_medium=email
................................

Main longer arm, it's 7082 11-1/8" effective length.

Stereo Only. use it's Z1s cartridge, upgrade Stylus to SAS/Boron.

https://www.jico-stylus.com/product/dt-z1s-sas-b/  (made by Victor Nivico)

light 1.5g tracking, J1 cartridge is high 5 mV output
........................................

Rear, to be purchased +/- 9" arm (not get a UA-7045)

Stereo and Mono use

select an arm specifically for medium/high compliance STEREO cartridge
and a medium/high compliance MONO cartridge.

That way I can continue to use both my Shures: 97xe elliptical and V15VxMR microline. Both light tracking, high output, use or not use Dynamic Stabilizer Brush (brush also grabs dust, reduces static). Both light tracking/high output

97xe: get an SAS/Boron Stylus from Jico

https://www.jico-stylus.com/product/n97xe-sas-b/  (made by Shure).


V15VmxMR: get SAS/Boron from Jico

https://www.jico-stylus.com/product/vn5xmr-hg-sas-b/  (made by Shure).
................................

Rear +/- 9" medium/high compliance arm
(need to wait till I can measure the distance of the tt's existing rear hole).

suggestions ________???
................................................

Joe Grado says OK for his Mono Cartridge ME+ with both JVC UA-7045 arm and Acos Lustre GST-801.

"it should work just fine
the compliance of the ME+ is 20cu"

http://www.resfreq.com/resonancecalculator.html 

......................
how do you compute from 20cu to _____ mu/mN???
found this. Is it about right?

"
The only way to accurately measure system resonance is with a calibrated low frequency test record and a chart recorder, or other sophisticated test equipment. Since most of us do not possess this capability, it is wise to do some preliminary homework in assessing the compatibility of any potential arm/cartridge combination. There are a few general "rules of thumb" that we need to consider:

* A tonearm whose effective mass is rated at 10 grams or below is considered low mass (e.g. early SME’s, Grace 747 etc.). A tonearm whose effective mass is rated between 11 and 25 grams is considered moderate mass (e.g. SME 309, IV, IV-Vi, V, Triplanar, Graham). Arms above 25 grams of mass are high mass in nature (Eminent Technology, Dynavector).

* A phono cartridge whose compliance is rated at 12 x l0ˉ6 or below, is considered low compliance. A cartridge whose compliance is rated between 13 x l0ˉ6 and 25 x l0ˉ6 is considered high to very high. Note: Another way of expressing compliance is um/mN. Here a rating of 5 to 10 is considered very low, 10 to 20 is moderate and above 35 is very high.
"

chakster, anone who knows:

ignoring Stylus,

Is the X-1II and X-1IIE cartridge internal construction the same?

Put a new Shibata in X-1IIE body essentially same as X-1II?

thanks, Elliott
chackster,

You missed the fact that I never mentioned the Z series.

I plan on moving to something better for the 7082 arm. (better than if I put a new Shibata in a Z-1S body).

First considering JVC X-1II. Thinking a new Shibata stylus with old X body rather than finding one with an old original stylus.

I am asking about putting a new Shibata in an X-1IIe body. Will that be equivalent to a new Shibata in a X-1II body?

IOW, what, if any, difference in the X-1II or X-1IIE cartridge internals.



An original body, X-1IIe, throw away it's elliptical stylus, get a new Shibata stylus for it (one for x-1II).

Is that frankenstein, or victor nirvana?
I never said original stylus.. I would not pay that much even if I found one as rare as that.

My question remains. Is x_1IIe Body internals SAME as x-1II body??? 


whatever the compliance's are, two new to me tonearms working with my MM cartridges. 

Acos Lustre GST-801 9" Arm using Shure V15VxMR body with new Jico SAS/Boron shaft, with Jico Brush. (btw, Jico told me their brush is just a brush, not dynamic dampening nor static removal like Shure's brush is).

JVC Victor UA-7082 11-1/8" long arm with new Grado ME+ Mono Cartridge, Elliptical stylus.

Haven't played test records, but they both sound great.
......................


both arms lifters not working.

7082: UPS broke the small curved arm that actually lifts the tonearm. The center post moves it a little bit only, but it is too far below the arm.

How do you adjust the height of the 7082's lifter's arm? (to get/start close to the tonearm).

GST-801 nothing lifts when lever is raised. I know how to loosen the set screw to raise/lower the lifter cylinder to get it close to the tonearm, but then there is no lift of the center shaft.

 

richard_crl032

I've installed two Micro Seiki 505s, 1 technics b-500 base/arm, and 1 Acos Lustre GST-801. All have easy VTA adjustment, but I would not adjust them while playing.

These JVC arms have ON THE FLY VTA, a big draw for perfectionists.

Maintain matching vintage appearance (they are cool looking), and use an existing tonearm hole after fix.

The composition difference between original rubber and replacement rubber is nearly irrelevant, it is the concept of isolation that was important, and simply get's restored.

OEM description in 1981:

"UA series universal tone arm with new gimbal support system.

The total length and effective length are different between UA-7082 and UA-7045.

The UA- 7082 and UA- 7045 are equipped with a helicoid height adjustment mechanism that can be adjusted during performance.

A virtual one point support structure is adopted for the bearing system, and strength and reliability superior to gimbal support are pursued.
In the virtual one point support structure, four precision radial ball bearings are arranged long distance from the virtual center point, so the force applied to each bearing and the rotation angle are equal for any rotation direction, and the same performance as the one point support can be obtained.
In addition, all bearings are fixed to the same part by micron precision machining using camera technology, ensuring high sensitivity and high durability.

A chucking lock type head connector is adopted, and looseness is eliminated by strongly tightening the shell plug part with the same principle as the drill chuck.

Uses a non-resonant head shell in which the shell body and plug part are integrally molded."

btw, the long 7082 is only 11-1/8" effective, one of the shortest long arms ever.