Cardas GoldenCross vs. NBS Statement or Monitor 0?


I am using Cardas Golden Cross speaker cables in my system and I am satisfied overall. But I would like a tiny bit more sweet and silky sound than now, which is very neutral. Would changing the speaker cable to NBS Statement help to make the sound a bit 'rich'?

My system is:
ML 31.5; Boulder 1012 pre/dac; Boulder 1060 poweramp; Avalon Eidolons; Harmonic Tech Magic Link digital cable; NBS Monitor 1 interconnects; Cardas Goldencross Speaker cables.

Thanks for your inputs.
cjpark

Showing 1 response by jadem6

I have experimented extensively over the past year with the Cardas Golden Cross, the Neutral Reference, FIM Gold, NBS Statement and Valhalla along with another 20 or so cables.

My opinion is you Cardas are the warmer of the group but also the least raveling. I found the FIM, NBS and Valhalla to have a far lower noise floor, reducing the amount of high frequency "hash" and producing a less fatiguing presentation.

If you want a warm clean sound the FIM are a place to start. The NBS and Valhalla are so similar it's a toss up to me. The Vallhala might be a bit more open and reveling, this may or may not cause you problems.

In my opinion the Cardas are excellent mid-fi cables, but any of the other three will take you to a new level. The lack of "hash" may sound to you as warmer, you must try a few to know.

Also for me I found the interconnects to have a larger impact on my system than the speaker cable so I would suggest working with some other interconnects and stick with your Cardas speaker cables for now.

J.D.