I wouldn't mind seeing something like that but this is maybe 10% listed here! just like one person said, Where is XXX Brand. And to those who say there can be no consensus. That might just be because there is NO Consensus on what constitutes personal feelings and not FACTS. If someone can come up with ;factual reliable definitions for the different qualities this could be done. You can define Volume or power or frequency response, but when you try to include factors that people can't even describe of at least have a consensus on what they mean, and these same people claiming that their feelings are important to the discussion, then you just threw any definable factor out the window. You are allowed to have your feelings and likes, but don't force them on the public until you can actually evaluate what a particular sound is and possibly even measure it.
Can we create a consensus list of the TONALITY of different amps/preamps/brands?
Greetings to any and all,
I am shopping for a new amp and preamp, but stuck abroad so unable to purchase anything right now. I have thus been reading lots and lots of reviews.
One thing that is very important to many of us is finding the right balance of Tonalities (warm versus cool, musical versus analytical, smooth versus detailed, etcetera).
Somewhere in all that research, I came upon a reviewer who started a comparative list of different brands, trying to get a handle of the general Tonality of various audio brands or individual products. Since then I have been adding to that list, sometimes extrapolating from the adjectives used (e.g. clean, neutral, etched, sweet, etc.).
One thing I should admit right off the bat is that I have personally listened to very few of these products. (I am just the collector of comparative adjectives, just a compiler. In no way do I consider this present list to be definitive or perfectly correct.) Of course, all this is completely subjective.
So I wonder if there is a way we can created a consensus compilation of opinions of the general tonality of various audio products. I am obviously soliciting input and opinions. Please feel free to disagree or suggest changes or refinements. The model I started with was of a clock face: 12:00 midnight being perfectly neutral. Anything after 12:00 is more analytical or clinical; anything before 12:00 is smoother or warmer.
(Thanks for any responses or contributions.)
Here is that list:
Halcro: 1:30 (hyperdetailed solid-state)
Simaudio amplifiers: 1:00 (even more clinical, analytical)
Audio Research Ref10 pre: slightly less cool than Simaudio 850p; maybe 12:30
Esoteric integrated: 12:30 (slightly to the cold, clinical side)
Boulder 1160/1161/2060 amps: 12:00 dead neutral (adding or subtracting nothing, no added tonal saturation, "sterile")
Rotel Michi M8: 11:45 ("kiss of midband lush")
Simaudio pre: 11:45 ("closest sounding amp to the Luxman")
Luxman 900 series: 11:30 (very slightly warmish)
Plinius SA-103: 11:30 ("natural, neutral tonal balance")
Pass X150.5: 11:15
Accuphase: 11:00 (warmer than Luxman)
Pass X250.8: 11:00
Pass x 260.8: 10:45
Pass XA 60.8/200.8: 10:30 (warm or saturated side)
Pass XS Pre: 10:30
VAC i170 tube amp: 9:30 (warmish)
PrimaLuna EVO 400 tube amp: 9:00 (warmer still)