Can Magnepan survive Wendell Diller?


I bought my first set of Magnepans in 1976, and I currently have a pair of 1.7i's.

It is difficult for me to upgrade to the 3.7i's because their are so many things that the company can do to improve their product that they simply won't offer; upgraded crossover components, a solid wood/rigid frames and better stands are examples.

Other companies are now doing this, but Magnepan always says Wendell doesn't think that is a good idea.

Can a man who suggests using lamp cord for his speaker line really have that much control over an otherwise unique technological approach to speaker design? I must be missing something obvious when a product is hand assembled in MN and any of these upgrades would, in my mind, warrant factory upgrades. Who wouldn't spend an extra $1k for a 1.7i with a hardwood frame and an upgraded x-over? Adding a ribbon tweeter to the 1.7i would warrant an additional $1k, still bringing them in $2k under the 3.7i.

Is it common for one person to hold an entire company back in high end audio? 
william53b

Showing 1 response by cmcdonnell

For those that want data for mods of the 1.6, Danny provided before and after response data. Have anyone noticed that Danny’s modification lowered the SPL to get flatter base response?  The efficiency is already low. My 1.6QR were rebuilt by Magnepan due to some delamination.  I had upgraded the capacitors to Claricaps and Magnepan left them alone during the rebuild.  For $675 I ended up with a practically brand new 1.6QR. Selected a new color for the sock and new wood trim. A few months ago I bypassed the fuse and removed the metal panel and tied the bi-amping posts together. An audible difference for those simple changes. The speakers sit on 2” maple slabs and the nylon washers are removed to eliminate the tilt. 
My opinion is that if there are simple modes that make a difference, enjoy the process of tweaking your system. I don’t think you can find a speaker measuring tool to demonstrate an increase in clarity or an improvement in the focus or imaging.  So if it sounds better to you, go for it. 
Thank you to all who take time for these discussions.