Cambridge Audio 840C

daltonlanny said why he was selling his unit in a response that is above - saids he needs the money -

you now i don't care who is selling their unit - im just enjoying mine and i have had many cd players up to the $2000-$3000 range and this one is so musical - it may not do other things that great - but it is so damn musical and continues to be musical after 5 months of listening.

It such a good piece in my system - and there usually is a lot of hype with products that i have bought and - well this is one of the few units that stand out in my 17 years of spending tons of money on equipment.

smargo

Smargo,

I wasn't challenging you or anyone else about the 840's sound quality, and I'm glad you found the cdp that fits your system.

I was just probing into people's psychology of buying and selling, trying to give an answer to those who posted questions on this forum and others, as to why so many units are for sale.

Thanks for your defense for the 840's virtues as I'm sure it will help some.

I've at least read through most of these posts and I'm surprised that there was not more mention of using the 840C's balanced outputs. As you probably know, Robert Harley in TAS made it clear that the 840C's sound is improved in all areas via its balanced outputs. I contacted him asking him to be a bit more specific about the differences, but his response was not very direct in this regard. This is what troubled me when I read the TAS review because I couldn't be sure how much better it sounded via its balanced outputs. I'm hoping to look into this more, but I'm wodering if some of those who aren't overly impressed with the 840C may have not listened to it in balanced mode. Harley felt it was important that it be heard using a fully balanced system. Unfortunately, many of us aren't able to do that.

If anyone has done the comparison of balanced vs. unbalanced operation of the 840C I would appreciate your input. It would be interesting to know if it really kicks its sound up a notch.

I did a brief comparison between my unbalanced and my balanced cables, but I suppose it's a bit of an unfair one as it was during the first 200 hours when things were breaking in. I started with balanced cables that were well broken in, and then my balanced cables arrived that I'd ordered specifically for the "improved sound" that RH discussed. I let these run for some time before really taking any time to listen again. There was improved openness and definition and imaging, but was that all due to the balanced cables being used, or due to the increased break in time, or both? Who knows. It sounds open, clear, articulate, and engaging, so I'm happy. I guess I could go back and insert the RCA cables now and see if I notice a reduction in any virtues from the player, sometime...
Also, I don't know if I remember anyone mentioning above, during the headphone discussion, the fact that the CD players that have a headphone output have a separate circuit for amplifying this signal for your headphones. So, when you listen through the headphone output, you're listening through a completely different amplification circuit, than would send a signal to your amplifier.

Rolloff

I found that at first the balanced outputs sounded much better.
But, I think the only reason they sounded better was because they were louder [more voltage output].
With the levels matched, the RCA's and the XLR outputs sound virtually the same, IMHO.