I always hate when you ask for opinion on somthing and people tell you other brands to try. So I won't do that the NAD has more power and a smoother sound so it sorta depends on your speakers I love NAD stuff they are way underated I have a 40 per channel integrated that is way more ballsy then my 105 watt perchannel Marantz home theater reciver amp. I think your on the right track for best sound on a budget and I think the NAD would be better BUT I havn't heard that model of the Cambridge it might be just as food though I doubt it. NAD Rocks !!
cambridge a3i or nad c-320bee
hi:
I am considering one of these two amps. I listen to all types a music typically classic rock and the my wife likes top 40, we occasional get in the mood for jazz and classical. I personally like my music loud, and have it on when I am puttering around the house. So I want something that is clear and has power. Unfortunatley I am on a budget. Other than these 2 amps would a "big box retail" typr of reciever rated higher be a wiser choice in this price point? Any recomandations on these amps or others greatly appreciated.
thanx
I am considering one of these two amps. I listen to all types a music typically classic rock and the my wife likes top 40, we occasional get in the mood for jazz and classical. I personally like my music loud, and have it on when I am puttering around the house. So I want something that is clear and has power. Unfortunatley I am on a budget. Other than these 2 amps would a "big box retail" typr of reciever rated higher be a wiser choice in this price point? Any recomandations on these amps or others greatly appreciated.
thanx