Natalie, as long as we are talking of "under achiever" cables, last year I was looking into a new cable and there was two "under achiever” cable companies that became known to me, Coincident and LAT International. I ended up buying a Coincident. I used the cable on my Fanfare tuner and it performed well, but you can’t tell a lot about a cable on a tuner. I tried it on my CD player, a Meridian 508.24, and with my setup I preferred the cable I was using, I can’t remember if that was the JPS I was using at that time or the XLO Reference 2 I later went to. The Coincident was not bad, it was just a bit to laid back.
All the cables mentioned above are balanced, as the manufactures of the equipment I was using recommended their balanced I/O’s for best performance, this was being fed to a Mark Levinson 383.
I am in the process of making huge changes in my system and the components I am going to do not allow for balanced cables, so I have to purchase some new ones. A few weeks ago I ordered LAT’s best IC, the IC-200 Mk II. I had a temporary setup while waiting to rebuild my system, an old heath amp and a Mac C42 preamp. I sold the 383 (a darn nice piece). Anyway, with this setup, I had the balanced XLO Ref. 2 going into the Mac C42 from the 508.24 and the LAT interconnect going into the C42 from the 508.24 at the same time. So with a push of a button on the remote I could go from the XLO to the LAT. (One side note, the C42 allows you to set the gain, they call it Input Trim, to adjust the volume level of each input to the same level.)
Long story short, the LAT outperformed the XLO, and did so in the RCA output, while Meridian claims best performance to be from the balanced output. Now, as the disclaimer above, these results were in my system. LAT has some interesting information on their Web site about cables.
I have just purchased a JPS SC2 interconnect that I will be able to compare also against the LAT. The LAT IC-200 Mk II is $189!!!
All the cables mentioned above are balanced, as the manufactures of the equipment I was using recommended their balanced I/O’s for best performance, this was being fed to a Mark Levinson 383.
I am in the process of making huge changes in my system and the components I am going to do not allow for balanced cables, so I have to purchase some new ones. A few weeks ago I ordered LAT’s best IC, the IC-200 Mk II. I had a temporary setup while waiting to rebuild my system, an old heath amp and a Mac C42 preamp. I sold the 383 (a darn nice piece). Anyway, with this setup, I had the balanced XLO Ref. 2 going into the Mac C42 from the 508.24 and the LAT interconnect going into the C42 from the 508.24 at the same time. So with a push of a button on the remote I could go from the XLO to the LAT. (One side note, the C42 allows you to set the gain, they call it Input Trim, to adjust the volume level of each input to the same level.)
Long story short, the LAT outperformed the XLO, and did so in the RCA output, while Meridian claims best performance to be from the balanced output. Now, as the disclaimer above, these results were in my system. LAT has some interesting information on their Web site about cables.
I have just purchased a JPS SC2 interconnect that I will be able to compare also against the LAT. The LAT IC-200 Mk II is $189!!!