The Marsh 200s sounds fast and clear and free of grain or glare. In my setup it does not sound "electronic" if you know what I mean. It does not double power when impedance is halved, but it never strained driving my Totem 1 speakers. The 200s costs less than the 3BST and the 400s is a little more. The Marsh amps are very good, the 400s is more powerful with better bass with some speakers.
Bryston vs Marsh
I currently have a Adcom gfa-555. I am thinking of buying a a Bryston 3bst or a Marsh 200. I have an ARC sp-9 preamp with Vandersteen 2c Spkrs. My question is would I notice a difference between tha adcom and either of the amps I mentioned and if so which is a better fit for my system?
TIA
TIA