Brooklyn Bridge or Aurender

Of course. A simple lapse. It’s the Brooklyn dac that does the MQA decoding. 

Wow George.
Does my N100 have this problem?

I don’t think so, it would have been madness of Aurender to continue even if it could do MQA with that, after it was exposed with the A10
But it just goes to show the lengths some "may" go to to gain advantages.

I doubt it but don’t forget "maybe" MQA "could" have been involved in this with Aurender, as they would have gained also from it, if it was never found out. (a conspiracy theory maybe)

All I can say is good on Stereophile and JA for telling all.

Aurender routinely fixes things via app updates.

If you read the Stereophile bench tests, they did do the latest firmware updates to try to fix it, but it didn’t apparently. Then Aurender wouldn’t comment on it when asked by JA. "Aurender declined to submit a comment for publication." Read into that what you will!!!

Cheers George

I wouldn’t trust anything Aurender did after they did this with their A10 network player/server trying to make MQA seem better than when it was switched out.

I think the Aurender is a find DAC I own a PS audio direct stream and have a Bricasti M3in the house for and Audition. it is just my opinion, but I think it is better than all of them.

The Aurender N100 is not a dac.
Your post is confusing. Which dac is better than which?