Broken hearted...magnepan and vandersteen


I finally got an opportunity to hear the 1.7i magnepan. I will blame my ears and taste, but I was underwhelmed. I heard them with tweeters inside and outside for comparison. outside did sound a bit better. Then I allowed them to play the vandersteen quatro ct. The speakers disappeared into the music. Deep, tall, wide soundstage with excellent imaging and air around the different instruments. Full range sound. Thankfully the trio ct sounded almost the quatros equal. I really was ready to go with magnepan. I was surprised. All other speakers are sounding inferior now. 
glfrancis2

Showing 6 responses by kenjit

The problem with the vandersteen speakers is that they have drivers that overlap over a wide range. This is not only pointless but can cause a muddy sound. Other speakers have a smaller area which overlaps so you get less interference. 
Vandersteen 60k flaghip speaker

22Hz-50kHz +/- 2dB

That's the only spec you get on their website. If their off axis response is something to be proud of which it should be at 60k then they ought to proudly provide these measurements. Every speaker designer worth his salt knows that off axis response is important. 


I will see the wizard of Hanford “ later this week and I will let him know team Holiday Inn thinks you have been doing it all wrong since 1977
Of course its all wrong. Magico, Wilson, Yg, Revel and every other speaker company that deliberately avoids first order slopes also thinks it's wrong. Most high end speakers avoid first order slopes. The wizard is in the minority that caters to a niche group.
best thing to do would be to have the crossovers for the vandersteens redone using higher order slopes for less lobing. 
speakers like vandersteen force the tweeter and woofer to go beyond their usual limits. This is a compromise not an achievement.