Børresen M3 vs. CSS (Jay Iyagi) vs. Wavetouch


Børresen M3 vs. CSS (Jay Iyagi) vs. Wavetouch

Warning! If you have a weak heart, don’t watch these videos. This music may lead a pounding heart. A reason GR (song writer) didn’t put more bass.

Please post your favorite, opinion, or thought. Alex/Wavetouch

Original music https://youtu.be/bn_NTLlX1FU?t=32

Wavetouch audio https://youtu.be/8pgXyqMdlLE?t=48

Børresen M3 https://youtu.be/tapjNr9P20M

CSS (Jay Iyagi) https://youtu.be/npNqik_dz60?t=394

mihorn

Showing 3 responses by facten

"People visit Audiogon to get the information and to see what is new to them. I share what I know and help them."

Yes people do, but they don't come on here for a manufacturer to advertise their products in threads nor to be told by said manufacturer that they don't know what they are hearing unless they select said manufacturer's product(s)

+1 @mofojo

Also, OP why bother asking for opinions when you decide to not respect the comments and simply tell everyone that you alone are the only one who can properly hear and assess.

 

"I read every posts in this thread and there is none promoting my products"

Promotion of your product:

1) You started a thread to get people to listen to a clip of your speakers

2) Then your comments:

     - " WT is closest to the orig music and WT is natural sound like the orig music"

     - "WT is the most closest to that voice. There are flesh, bones, and focus like real music in WT sounds to my ears"

     - "Both orig music and WT sounds are very much similar than with M3 sound.     if WT sound lacking body to your ears at the time, the orig music sound might be lacking body too to your ears."

    - "your ears could be in un-natural sound hearing mode after hearing M3"

There's your promotion of your product