Big systems - Little rooms


I enjoy browsing the Virtual Systems posted online here ( and have posted my own).  I am puzzled , however, by the too common practice of placing large ( and usually expensive) speakers into very tight confines, often less than a foot from the front wall and barely more from the side walls.  Presumably the sitting position is likely against the back wall.  Many of these systems also have significant power and expensive source components.  While I may be as susceptible as most to upgradeitis, I have tried to give some recognition to the size of my listening space in my equipment selection.  Have I overlooked some new approach to managing room acoustics, or are most speakers not as sensitive as some articles describe to position within the room.  It would otherwise seem that these systems might benefit from  a bit of downsizing to achieve superior sound imaging.
sjtm

Showing 1 response by folkfreak

As one of the individuals with a system such as you describe you make a fair point. But if you a) select speakers that are designed to be used relatively close to the rear wall (e.g. no rear ports), and b) design and treat the room for such use (i.e. bass traps built into the walls etc) then it can work well. I suspect the latter would meet the characteristics of "some new approach to managing room acoustics" that you refer to. 

In particular as it is very easy to treat the wall behind the listener so having the listening seat up against the rear wall should never be an issue.

The opposite -- cavernous spaces with multiple reflecting surfaces, is also very common especially given the trends in US interior design (i.e. open concept) and can be equally if not more problematic