For some reason that link got corrupted
http://www.synergisticresearch.com/page/cables/speaker_cable/integrated_frequency_termination
http://www.synergisticresearch.com/page/cables/speaker_cable/integrated_frequency_termination
Bi-wired vs Single Termination
For some reason that link got corrupted http://www.synergisticresearch.com/page/cables/speaker_cable/integrated_frequency_termination |
This is a very interesting subject. I was always one to say two separate runs, biwired and combined at the amp end, was the best way to go. Jumpers seemed to be a band-aid solution. But then I became enamored with Synergistic Research cables (namely their Tesla active line). Ted And the folks at SR are actively (no pun intended) pushing for an integrated jumper architecture, not two wires. Read their explanation here: >SR biwire theory |
I demo'd and loved the Tesla Accelerator (both IC's and SC's but not at the same time). A set of biwired Tesla sc's are in my near future. I'd likely biwire as per SR. In the meantime I use the incredibly hi-value Reality Cables (Gregg Straley's design) and just today received a used set of his jumpers. I do believe that if using jumpers one should use the same cable model, if possible. The cables I replaced are AZ Satori shotgun and they use separate runs, combined at the amp end. Robert Lee designs them to have an ever so shorter low pass end than the high pass. |