Better Records Hot Stampers: Or, how I learned to stop collecting and love listening


We are witnessing an absolute explosion in vinyl. It’s thrilling, but it has also become frankly overwhelming. What matters? The experience of listening, of course. But, how do we know, I mean, how do we really know, what listening experiences are going to be sublime? Too often, collectability becomes our proxy for listening. We’ve all done it - chasing a near mint early pressing, a Japanese or German pressing, a re-press from a label we trust. We all end up with multiple copies of our favorite records, but only listen to one or two of them. And whether we sell them or not, it brings us some comfort to see their going rates on Discogs continue to climb. For me at least, FOMO was a strange driver of my buying habits. I regretted records I *didn’t* purchase, far more often than I regretted purchases I did make, even as I have about a year’s worth of listening in records still sealed on the shelf. I’m even afraid to open some of them because I can see their value is rising. Isn’t that silly? 

I love records. Listening to them, curating a collection, is a joyful hobby. It gets at some need I can't quite name. But, of course, records shouldn't be only for collecting. They are for the pleasure of listening. My philosophy was pretty off-base. I didn’t even perceive it that way, and here’s what got me to realize it, and get out of it. 

Last summer, I came across an original mono pressing of Mingus Ah Um in one of my local shops. It was labelled as a “top copy” and the surface looked pretty good. The price was a little absurd, and considering I had the OneStep and the Classic Records pressings, I wasn’t sure I needed it. But, this is an album I loved, even as a kid, even on digital, and a first pressing held a lot of allure. I took some time to think about it, do some online comparison shopping, and by the time I got back to the shop, it was gone. In a fit of pique, I bought the copy Better Records was selling. It was listed as a Super Hot Stamper, and it was slightly cheaper than the copy the shop was selling. With a 30-day no-questions-asked return policy, it seemed a safe bet.

Well, you can imagine my disappointment when it arrived a few days later. Nicely boxed for shipping, I unsleeved what was clearly a later pressing. My disappointment magnified when the needle dropped and the first thing I heard was surface noise. I’ve been conditioned by the heavy vinyl renaissance to equate surface noise with a bad-sounding record. 

But then, the instruments kicked in, and from the first notes I could tell I was listening to something really different. It was clear, forward, and dynamic. Nothing harsh, even in the horns, but so much more engaging and rich than I was used to. It was the drum solo partway through the first track that convinced me I was hearing something special in this pressing. I sat and listened to the entire record without doing anything else, and for me, something that holds my attention to where I don’t want to grab my phone or a book is part of what defines a peak listening experience. 

What next? They also had a Super Hot Stamper of Abraxas listed. Owning the Mofi one step, along with a few other pressings, and this being another album I’ve loved for years, I decided to take the challenge that Better Records makes, and see if their copy could unseat my others. The presentation of the hot stamper and the onestep are really different. The hot stamper reaches out and grabs you. The percussion is forward, hitting you right in the chest. The onestep is huger, it fills the room with a massive soundstage. The instruments on the onestep are less differentiated, except (on my system, at least, which tends to be bright) for the chimes and hi hat hits, which absolutely stand out on the onestep. The onestep has some tape hiss I don’t hear on the hot stamper early pressing. I love a black background, which my tube preamp doesn’t really have in the first place, so I find that tape hiss a little objectionable, since it further compromises a weak spot in my system. My thirteen year old prefers the mofi; I prefer the hot stamper. At this point, the hot stamper is bound to be a lot cheaper than you'd pay for the mofi, and you can consider it a toss-up between the two - they have different attributes.

I’m an empiricist, so naturally I looked up the matrix numbers on Discogs. For $30 I purchased a copy that had matching matrix numbers, at least as close as I could get them. (You feel kinda stupid when you send a discogs seller three messages saying, “but would you say that’s a faint N or a faint Z scrawled in the deadwax?” Enough already. Just buy the stupid thing.) The discogs copy had a family resemblance to my hot stamper in terms of its sound, and it was also in near mint condition with no evident listening damage. But, the experience is different. The hot stamper simply sounds more real and immediate. I recognize what I’m describing is the complete opposite of A/B double-blind testing, but which is the copy I keep putting on, feeling engrossed and enlivened by with spin after spin? (The miniscule writing in the dead wax was indeed not identical, so the experiment wasn’t perfect, but it was enough for me to have trust that hot stampers are a good value proposition for me. It sure beats buying a stack of copies at $5-$25 and picking out your favorite from them.) 

Now I’m now ten Hot Stampers in, and planning to cool it, at least for a little while. I’ve been able to get many of my favorites (Stardust, Rumors, Mahavishnu, some Zeppelin, some Ella, some Beatles) in Hot Stamper format. That’s good enough for me while I start thinking about a speaker upgrade. I can say this has been true in my experience - no matter how many other pressings of a title you have, if you buy a Better Records Hot Stamper, you can play it in a “shootout” style against the rest of your stack of that title, and you will find that either it bests them all, or at very least, it gives you a different presentation that you will value and want to hold on to. For me, this has been true for ten of the eleven purchases I’ve made. Try it sometime. Even if you start with the regular hot stampers, you’ll hear they are different.

So, although I have a very collectable collection that I hope and expect will hold its value over the years to come, it is with joy, relief, and a sense of relaxation that I shift my record-buying focus now to listenability rather than collectability. As we cope with the ever-growing onslaught of new pressings and inflation in the prices we’re seeing on discogs, listenability is a great way to cut through the noise and put your record-buying money where it matters. 

It is really hard to buy for listenability anywhere other than on Better Records. Maybe if you have a friend who wants to sell you some of his records, you could do it. But, if you’re buying on Discogs or ebay, you’re not buying for how things sound. Occasionally, you can hear listening descriptions as part of the seller’s grading, but those are not comparisons to other pressings of the same title. And, as much as I like to support my local record stores, when it comes to listening first as a basis for buying, you can basically forget about it.

I’ve been formulating these thoughts for a while, but not sure why I’d want to post them. I mean, who wants to drive more customers to this guy when I still want to buy his merchandise, and some titles already sell out within seconds of listing, before I can even make up my mind? But, here you have it. Merry Christmas, I guess. Add my voice to the choir - you can buy better records hot stampers with confidence.
 

ab_ba

also, a careful look at my systems will reveal ten ( or more ) different speakers and amplifiers. A decent sample size including high efficiency. ;-)

Best to you on your musical journey, each one is different.

Jim

also a serious student of Nelson would consider also psychoacoustic and what kinds and amounts of distortion people finds intoxicating for short periods and obnoxious over longer durations. Many of us who are student's of Nelson and other greats like Roger Modjeski ( see Burning amp ) have built variable THD amplifiers…. 

By the way, with the hot , you are level matching…right ? Thought so. Louder is always better…

tomic, I’m trying to parse all that. Sounds like you’re saying that to get a driver that acts like a piston (which minimizes coloration and distortion) you’ve got to drive it with a lot of power. And it sounds like you’re saying to make sure my amp’s adding no distortion. Some types of distortion can make an amp sound good when you demo it, but it fatigues after a while. Like when the TV on display at Best Buy is set on high-contrast. Once you get it home you’ve got to turn that down. Am I catching the points you’re making?

And, as regards my hot stampers, I’ve got to cool it for a while. I’m back to my local used shop, but with a newfound appreciation for all of those 70s and 80s reissues that just sat on peoples’ shelves and are in good condition, sound great, and cost $5. I like this WAY more than overbuying new pressings that end up sounding cleaner but lackluster. 
 

As for matching sound levels, I try to do that a little when I do shootouts. Just using an spl app on my phone. But, one way to differentiate a hot stamper is when you turn up the volume. Grain and groove wear and bad mastering become easier to notice at louder volumes. The shortcomings are most salient when you go beyond normal listening volumes, but I think they are still having some effect at any volume. 

Hey hot stamper aficionados, I'm wondering which of your hot stampers give you the biggest improvement relative to your other copies of the same album.

From my stack of hot stampers, it's Rumours (beats my Steve Hoffman 45), and Mingus Ah Um (beats my onestep.)

How about you?

it is that simple.  many times during the course of an albums history they are remastered and so on so you have to know the engineers.  It makes a big difference.  there may be a better pressing from plant to plant but I doubt there is that much variation to justify hundreds of dollars.